".. His mind slid away into the labyrinthine world of doublethink. To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies.. to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself -- that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word "doublethink" involved the use of doublethink." (1984, George Orwell, p. 32,33)
In an effort to make the Watchtower appear more benign to the public (especially in countries where the local government are unfamiliar with the carefully- chosen language of authoritarian religions), the Watchtower's Legal Department as well as their rule-enforcing Service Department are promoting a new strategy. The degree of "doublespeak" we have seen in the last few months gives us a glimpse at this simple ruse. One is reminded of Communism, where government is supposedly "by the people," and all are accorded a "fair trial," yet in the end the outcome can be predicted with almost 100% certainty. Any dissenter is kicked out and shunned.
An example scenario would be: Brother Jones, who works along with other elders in making sure Witnesses receive proper treatment at hospitals (known as members of the Watchtower's Hospital Liaison Committees) reports to Brooklyn that Sister Smith was in a car accident and lost a lot of blood. Her husband, also a Jehovah's Witness, makes the decision for her to accept blood, as she is unconscious and is about to die. She receives a blood transfusion and lives through the operation. Two weeks later she and her husband are called before a committee of elders at the local Kingdom Hall and asked why she was allowed to be given blood. Select scriptures are read, and the Bible and Watchtower logic are appealed to, citing the ban on receiving blood for Jehovah's people. Sister Smith anguishes over the possibility of being disfellowshipped for breaking God's law on blood, and the committee decides not to disfellowship her, as she has a truly repentant attitude, and also she was not the one who made the decision. Brother Smith, on the other hand, knew that she had to have blood or die, and makes his case before the elders. After the meeting, Brother Smith is told he will be disfellowshipped for will fully breaking God's law.
In such a scenario, the Watch Tower Society can say that no one is automatically disfellowshipped, which looks good to those on the outside world. Yet in reality receiving a blood transfusion is STILL A BIG SIN TO THE WATCHTOWER, and anyone not fully expressing hatred and loathing for this act of sin WILL be disfellowshipped. So nothing has really changed. The Watchtower is CORRECT in saying that their doctrines regarding the Bible have not changed. They are also correct in saying that no one is automatically disfellowshipped. Some may have accidentally broken the rules of the organization, and if they cry and show enough remorse, they will simply be watched and given a warning, or perhaps be stripped of certain responsibilities. Yet if they broke the rules of the organization WILLFULLY or even if it was an accident and they do not grovel before the local elders, they WILL be disfellowshipped with virtually no exception. Does this sound like free "choice"?
Actually, the bottom line in this system is obedience to the leadership, the "faithful and discreet slave." Note contents of a letter to all circuit and district overseers of Jehovah's Witnesses as reproduced in the book Crisis of Conscience by Raymond Franz:
Keep in mind that to be disfellowshipped, an apostate does not have to be a promoter of apostate views. As mentioned in paragraph two, page 17 of the August 1, 1980, Watchtower, "The word 'apostasy' comes from a Greek term that means `a standing away from,' `a falling away, defection,' `rebellion, abandonment.' Therefore, if a baptized Christian abandons the teachings of Jehovah, as presented by the faithful and discreet slave, and persists in believing other doctrine despite Scriptural reproof, then he is apostatizing. Extended, kindly efforts should be put forth to readjust his thinking. However, if, after such extended efforts have been put forth to readjust his thinking, he continues to believe the apostate ideas and rejects what he has been provided through the `slave class,' then the appropriate judicial action should be taken. (-quote from Crisis of Conscience, Second Edition, pp 293).
Conformity of thought is the ultimate guideline. Yet much effort goes into convincing the rank-and-file that they are really operating under a system free of authoritarian mind control. (The Free Minds Journal, Fall 1998, p. 10)