U.S. Army & Court Recognize Witches (Wiccans) As A Religion

 

 

Reports that the U.S. Army had appointed chaplains to witches (they prefer Wiccans) turned out
not to be true, but the army, along with several courts, has recognized them as a religion.
There are supposed to be somewhere around fifty thousand adherents of the cult, which has a
special appeal to teenage girls.
 
Congressman Bob Barr is among those who think the army is overreaching on the tolerance front. Andrew Stuttaford writes in National Review: "Citing an image of George Washington at prayer, the Congressman managed to suggest that witchcraft was somehow un-American. He could not be more wrong. For if ever a religion was tailor-made for a contemporary America in full flight from the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers, it is Wicca." Stuttaford notes that Wicca was invented in the 1950s by a retired British civil servant, Gerald Gardner, who had a reported interest in nudism and flagellation.
 
The doctrine, so to speak, patches together bits and pieces of J. R. R. Tolkien, with practitioners
communicating in Hobbitspeak and going on about the olde worlde magick of Athanes, Stangs,
Runes, Summerland, and scrying-glass.
 
In its American version, Wicca has taken a fiercely feminist turn, with instant victim status certified by its very own holocaust, the old European "burning times." Stuttaford expects that Wiccans will soon be making the standard victim claims about discrimination, hate crimes, and the need for affirmative action for Wiccans as "the old witch's cackle is replaced with the litigant's whine." The military is a special case and it has doubtful competence to make decisions about what its members say is their religion. An inquiry elicited a long Department of Defense document that, in circuitous bureaucratese, indicates that the Wiccans will not be getting chaplains any time soon.
 
For more general legal purposes, the First Amendment provides little guidance. It guarantees that
the federal government will not establish a national religion and will not interfere with what the states do about religion. Aside from a relatively small number of people putting their souls in peril-a risk freely indulged in various ways by most Americans-I expect the Wiccans do not warrant a prominent place on our list of things to worry about.
 
They are prime candidates for one of those little newspaper squibs ten years from now, under the title "Where are they now?" Dennis Prager says he is embarrassed, as a Jew and as an American. Since 1853, the baccalaureate service at Duke University, which is associated with the United Methodist Church, has included giving to each participating graduate a copy of the Bible, meaning the Old and New Testaments. Last year, Jewish faculty and students objected, claiming it is
offensive to Jewish students to offer them a book that contains the New Testament.
 
Prager writes: "To summarize the situation in even simpler terms: Duke Jewish faculty and students
and Jewish institutions at Duke object to Jewish students participating in a service where Duke offers a gift of a Bible that contains their own Jewish Bible and also the New Testament; where any participant is free not to take that Bible; at a service that is entirely voluntary; in a university that is private and affiliated with the Methodist Church. One of the best words to describe this attitude is actually a Hebrew/Yiddish one-chutzpah. Another word might be ingratitude.
 
We American Jews are probably the most fortunate Jews in Jewish history. We live the freest, most economically secure lives in Jewish history in a country that not merely tolerates our religion, but has always honored it. And who made such a country possible? Men and women, nearly all of whom were Christian, who regarded Judeo-Christian values as the basis of this society, even as many of them fell short of these values. In our specific case, it was not Jews who made Duke University, it was Christians, indeed a specific Christian church.

Instead of being grateful to the tradition that created their country and their university, some Duke Jewish faculty and students have decided that they are offended by it." Prager continues: "The Jews of Duke have undermined the Judeo-Christian and Western cultural foundations of American culture and of their university. And for what? So that Jewish students not hold a Bible containing Christian scriptures. How sad. Apparently, Multiculturalism and Tolerance don't apply to Christians." In the tradition of clear thinking and firm adherence to principle for which academic leadership is noted, Duke has responded to the protest by deciding that Bibles will no longer be handed out but will be stacked in a separate room where students who are interested in that sort of thing may take one. [ http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0001/public.html ]

BACK