INTERNATIONAL PULSE

Period: March 2009

6666666

 

ISRAEL



-----
ISRAEL'S DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
http://www.davidbengurion.com/documents/58.html#DEC

-----
ISRAEL'S NETANYAHU VOWS TO SEEK PEACE WITH ARABS
By STEVEN GUTKIN (AP Writer) - From Associated Press - March 31, 2009 EDT
JERUSALEM - Benjamin Netanyahu, taking office as Israel's new leader Tuesday, promised to seek "full peace" with the Arab and Muslim world, but refused to utter the words the world was waiting to hear: "Palestinian state." The well-spoken, U.S.-educated hawk took pains to portray himself as a pragmatist, telling a packed parliament that Israel does not want to rule the Palestinians.
"Under the permanent status agreement, the Palestinians will have all the authority to rule themselves," Netanyahu said in comments that appeared to hark back to a decades-old notion that peace could be achieved through limited Palestinian autonomy. His words drew a sharp reaction from Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat. "I want to say to Mr. Netanyahu that the only way the Palestinians can rule themselves, by themselves, is through ending the Israeli occupation that began in 1967 and establishing an independent Palestinian state," Erekat said. Netanyahu's refusal to embrace the idea of Palestinian statehood could put him at odds with the Obama administration and much of the rest of the world. So could his decision to appoint ultranationalist politician Avigdor Lieberman as foreign minister.
In recent days, however, Netanyahu has moved to soften his image, welcoming the centrist Labor party into an otherwise markedly right-wing coalition and announcing that he supports peace talks with the Palestinians. The 59-year-old politician - the son of a prominent historian and the brother of a war hero who died commanding the daring 1976 hostage rescue at Entebbe, Uganda - is returning to the premiership a decade after being forced from it amid a string of failures. Continued: http://www.cephas-library.com/israel_3.31.2009_Netanyahu_gets_to_lead_Israel.html

-----
UNEXPECTED URGENT REFUGEE AND MIGRATION NEEDS RELATED TO GAZA
Federal Register: February 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 22) - DOCID: fr04fe09-106 FR Doc E9-2488
Presidential Documents - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
NOTICE: Part II http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488
DOCID: fr04fe09-106 Document Summary: [[Page 6115]] - Presidential Determination No. 2009-15 of January 27, 2009 - Memorandum for the Secretary of State - By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the ``Act''), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not to exceed $20.3 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza. You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
(Presidential Sig.) - THE WHITE HOUSE, - Washington, January 27, 2009 - [FR Doc. E9-2488 - Filed 2-3-09; 8:45 am] - Billing code 4710-10-P
FINE PRINT:
By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza. The "presidential determination" which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4. President Obama's decision, according to the Register, was necessitated by "the urgent refugee and migration needs" of the "victims." Whole story: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2181149/posts

-----
IN 2009 EUROPE, THE JEW REMAINS THE SCAPEGOAT
By Stan Goodenough - February 10, 2009 - Jews are to blame for the intensifying global financial crisis, are more loyal to Israel than to the European nations where they live, and harp far too much on the Holocaust. These classic and archaic antisemitic views are entertained today by nearly a third of Europeans, according to the results of a new study conducted by the Anti Defamation League (ADL).
ADL Director Abe Foxman was quoted on Ynetnews Tuesday as saying that a poll carried out in seven European countries - Austria, France, Hungary, Poland, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom - revealed that "antisemitism remains alive and well in the minds of many Europeans."
"It is distressing that there seems to be no movement away from the constancy of antisemitic held views, with accusations about Jews of disloyalty, control and responsibility for the death of Jesus," he added.
For nearly 2000 years, Europe's soil has been saturated with the "longest hatred."
Traditionally, almost eagerly, scapegoated for national ills ranging from the Black Death to the Great Fire of London, Europe's Jews only ended up in Hitler's death camps in such great numbers because of the legacy of antisemitism that had for so long infested society on the continent.
The ADL Poll was carried out before and during Israel's Operation Cast Lead against the terrorists firing missiles from Gaza last month. Often skewed reports of that IDF action triggered waves of antisemitism in countries around the world, including the United States. http://www.jnewswire.com/article/2617

-----
ISRAEL'S ELECTIONS: PLEASE EXPLAIN TZIPI WON AND MAY LOSE, BIBI LOST AND MAY WIN! WHY CAN'T ISRAELI ELECTIONS BE SMOOTH AND SIMPLE - LIKE AMERICA'S?
JERUSALEM WATCHMAN: 12 February 2009 - “Dad,” my oldest son asked me a few minutes ago. “Who won the elections?”
“Well, Tzipi won one more seat than Bibi, but there’s a good chance Bibi will be the next prime minister.”
“Huh?” He said quizzically, adding after a minute: “I wish Israel’s elections were like America’s. They were easy to understand.”
Granted, my 14-year-old and I followed the 2008 US election year pretty closely. And even though we are not Americans, we didn’t need to be rocket scientists to understand what was happening there:
Two parties. Two sets of ideas - some overlapping but mostly clear cut lines separating the two. One man (or woman) and his elected vice presidential candidate ultimately representing each party. You vote for the one you basically agree with, and the one who gets most votes becomes president. Likewise with the congressmen and senators – individuals run for election under one of the two party banners and the winner goes to the hill.
It’s amazing how well that system works – and it works for hundreds of millions of people.
In Israel, barely five million voters need to be educated, appealed to, and processed. Why can’t the process be as straightforward and successful here? I want to answer the question, which has also been asked by my readers “out there.” My boy needs to understand how elections work in Israel because next time – provided they are not early elections, as these were – he will be old enough to vote.
As importantly – in fact more so - I want him to understand how Christian Zionists view Israel’s elections – what are the issues those who share our faith believe to be important when it comes to who governs Israel, how they do it, and what the consequences are. But I will keep this second part for a separate article and endeavor here to cover the first part in as straightforward a way as I can: Tuesday morning, February 10, the polling booths opened and Israelis began voting to elect a new government under the leadership of a new prime minister.
At the same time, the first real storm of a winter that has been all but non-existent blew in. Snow in the north, rain, hail and gusting winds accompanied by thunder further south to Jerusalem; the inclemency threatened to keep many of the 5.2 million eligible voters home. Election watchers had forecast a lower turnout than was hoped for even before the storm appeared. But those running for office and Israel’s president, Shimon Peres, appealed to the electorate to behave “maturely” and get out and vote. Israel’s voters include all adults over the age of 18 who are citizens of the State of Israel – whether they be Jew, Muslim Arab, Christian Arab, Beduin, Druze or one of the handful of gentiles from other lands who have been granted citizenship here. By day’s end, fully 60 percent of voters had done their duty – which while not a record certainly was an improvement over the last general election, and handily proved the pundits wrong. Of course this is the right and normal way in a democracy. The people of the land enjoy the privilege and practice the responsibility of choosing their leaders in accordance with the criteria that are important to them as citizens. They understand they have to live with their choice; and if they should support a losing candidate, they will have to abide by the choice of the majority until next election day. Continued: http://www.stangoodenough.com/?p=206

-----
FINAL ELECTION RESULTS: KADIMA 28 SEATS, LIKUD 27, YISRAEL BEITEINU 15
By Shahar Ilan, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service
02/12/2009 - Members of Israel's central elections committee said on Thursday the apportionment of Knesset seats would remain as is following the final tally of Israel Defense Forces soldiers' ballots.
Kadima led by Tzipi Livni captured the largest number of Knesset seats - 28 - edging the Likud's 27 seats. Yisrael Beiteinu made history on Tuesday, becoming the third-largest party in the Knesset with 15 seats. The Labor Party finished with a disappointing 13 seats; Shas with 11; United Torah Judaism won five seats; the National Union captured four; United Arab List - Ta'al - four; Hadash - three; Meretz - three; Balad - three; and Bayit Hayehudi ("The Jewish Home") - three.
The results of Tuesday's election were finalized Thursday after the votes of IDF soldiers were tallied. It was thought these additional ballots could nab Yisrael Beiteinu or the Likud party another Knesset seat, which would have put Likud and Kadima on equal standing in terms of Knesset representation.
Knesset seats are allocated after a party's votes are divided by 120, the number of parliament seats. About 28,000 votes are required per seat. Parties must garner at least 2 percent of the vote to be represented in parliament. The party closest to approaching the 2 percent minimum, the Green Movement-Meimad, is not expected to make the cut, as it would need more than 40,000 additional votes.
Excess voting arrangements allow parties with more than the necessary minimum to enter parliament, but less than the votes needed to nab an extra seat, to allocate "excess" votes to an allied party.
The military vote was not expected to nab Meretz a fourth seat. Zahava Gal-On, one of the Knesset's most highly-regarded lawmakers, is fourth on the Knesset list. President Shimon Peres will not begin consulting with the parties over the formation of a new coalition until next Wednesday, when the election results are officially published.
Kadima, Likud declare victory after final tally ... Kadima repeated its call for Netanyahu to join a national unity government with Tzipi Livni serving as prime minister. "With the completion of the vote count Kadima won and it is the largest party," the party statement read. "Netanyahu must accede to Tzipi Livni's call and join a centrist national unity government headed by her."
Likud officials responded to Kadima's statement with scorn. "Kadima's statement is pathetic and shows that it continues to spin some imagined reality instead of recognizing a political reality in accordance with the voter's verdict," a Likud communiqué read. "An absolute majority of Israelis wants Netanyahu as prime minister and clearly rejected Kadima's way which has failed." ttp://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1063744.html

-----
COMMENT ON THE ELECTION
Writing for The American Thinker, Michael M. Rosen said: "Indeed, Netanyahu's chief peace process argument is that true physical and political coexistence between Israel and the Palestinians will come about only through financial well-being. Bibi believes that further concessions by Israel at this moment would only embolden the worst elements in Palestinian society, while steady, mutual economic expansion will sap the lifeblood of Islamic extremism. ... So while in most ways, Netanyahu and Obama seem far less well-suited for one another, ... a political partnership between the two isn't out of the question. The American-Israeli relationship is, in today's parlance, 'too big to fail,' and both leaders will have little choice but to do all they can to preserve it."
The Jerusalem Connection says: "The American-Israeli relationship ... to big to fail?" Let's hope so. But that will only happen if both pursue an agenda that is in sync with God's agenda. And God's agenda has no place for a "Land for Peace" solution or one which allows for the division of Jerusalem. While this may happen due to the "infinite wisdom" of our leaders, it will fail to pass muster with God. Indeed, God has spoken and He has not stuttered. "On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, 'To your descendants I give this land from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.'" (Genesis 15:18). Only as man's peace plans are in keeping with God's, is there any hope of success. http://www.jerusalemonline.com/specials10.asp

-----
RECENT COMMENT "WHOEVER FINISHES FIRST WITH NANOTECHNOLOGY WILL BE THE MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD." IT WILL CHANGE THE WAY WE LIVE
by Steven Shamrak - Feebraury 19, 2009 - Nanotechnology Conference in Israel. The first International Nanotechnology Conference held in Israel will open on March 30, 2009. The purpose of this two-day conference is to showcase Israeli research and innovation in nanotechnology and to bring together a group of world-class experts who are working on the "hottest" technologies in the field. (A few years ago it was biotechnology now Israel is a world leader in Nanotechnology!) http://freeworldexpress.com/

-----
ISRAEL BORROWING A PAGE FROM PUTIN
16 February 2009 - By Alexei Bayer - Brighton Beach -- Brooklyn's Russian-speaking, largely Jewish outpost -- provides an answer to many political problems facing Russia and the Middle East.
Jews from the former Soviet Union are probably the most successful immigrant community in the United States. Highly educated and urban, we came here in the 1970s and 1980s, when the number of foreign-born Americans was near an all-time low and the country still welcomed newcomers. We had the support of the U.S. Jewish community. No less important, we were given refugee status, which gave us access to additional benefits not available to other immigrants. In the Soviet Union, we suffered the usual oppression of the totalitarian state, but this was exacerbated in our case by anti-Semitism -- both from the government and citizens at large. You'd expect us to love freedom and treasure democracy, protection for minority rights and other such niceties.
Not in the least. The fact that former Soviet Jews cast almost 85 percent of their votes for former President George W. Bush in 2004 and supported Senator John McCain by a substantial plurality last year is not the real issue, of course. More troubling, our community has begun to lean toward more racist, intolerant attitudes. It tends to dislike all dissidents and troublemakers, admires force and supports military solutions. And what I find most amazing, the Russian Jewish community is showing increasing intolerance and hatred toward immigrants who they fear are turning the civilized, white United States into a Third World country.
Does this sound familiar? It's those same post-Soviet attitudes that have infected Russia. Even though Jews have been targets of anti-Semitic forgeries like the infamous "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," I received countless e-mails from Russian Jews alleging that U.S. President Barack Obama is anything from a Muslim to the antichrist. Only a bit more than 10 percent of Russian speakers supported him. Continued: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/1016/42/374565.htm

-----
ISRAEL LAUNCHES COVERT WAR AGAINST IRAN
Israel has launched a covert war against Iran as an alternative to direct military strikes against Tehran's nuclear programme, US intelligence sources have revealed. - By Philip Sherwell in New York
Febraury 16, 2009 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/4640052/Israel-launches-covert-war-against-Iran.html

-----
TZIPI LIVNI GIVE UP HALF OF LAND OF ISRAEL
Tzipi Livni, who hopes to be appointed Israel's prime minister, has said that her country needs to give up half of the biblical Land of Israel to secure peace with the Palestinians. - By Our Foreign Staff and Agencies in Jerusalem - 16 Feb 2009 - Drawing clear water between her centrist Kadima party and the Right-wing Likud party of her rival for the premiership, Benjamin Netanyahu, she conceded that claims on the territory must be abandoned for progress to be made. She told a convention of American Jewish leaders that "we need to give up half of the Land of Israel", using a term that refers to biblical borders that include today's Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. She explained that such a withdrawal would be for the good of Israel, to maintain it as a Jewish state. Miss Livni said that Israel must take the initiative and come forward with its own peace plan to head off international initiatives. "Any plan put on the table will not be in our interest," she said.
Mr Netanyahu opposes large-scale territorial concessions in peace talks with the Palestinians. He believes negotiations should concentrate instead on building up the Palestinian economy. Efforts to secure a lasting ceasefire with Hamas took a step forward when a leader of Gaza's Islamist rulers said that they would consider opening negotiations over the fate of the captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Ehud Olmert, the acting Israeli prime minister, is to convene his security cabinet on Wednesday to consider swapping Palestinian prisoners for Cpl Shalit. However, another Hamas spokesman complained that "a clear agreement" on a Gaza ceasefire had been reached before Mr Olmert insisted at the weekend that the soldier be freed first. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/4642371/Tzipi-Livni-give-up-half-of-Land-of-Israel.html

-----
AN INVENTION CALLED 'THE JEWISH PEOPLE'
By Tom Segev - Israel's Declaration of Independence states that the Jewish people arose in the Land of Israel and was exiled from its homeland. Every Israeli schoolchild is taught that this happened during the period of Roman rule, in 70 CE. The nation remained loyal to its land, to which it began to return after two millennia of exile. Wrong, says the historian Shlomo Zand, in one of the most fascinating and challenging books published here in a long time. There never was a Jewish people, only a Jewish religion, and the exile also never happened - hence there was no return. Zand rejects most of the stories of national-identity formation in the Bible, including the exodus from Egypt and, most satisfactorily, the horrors of the conquest under Joshua. It's all fiction and myth that served as an excuse for the establishment of the State of Israel, he asserts.
According to Zand, the Romans did not generally exile whole nations, and most of the Jews were permitted to remain in the country. The number of those exiled was at most tens of thousands. When the country was conquered by the Arabs, many of the Jews converted to Islam and were assimilated among the conquerors. It follows that the progenitors of the Palestinian Arabs were Jews. Zand did not invent this thesis; 30 years before the Declaration of Independence, it was espoused by David Ben-Gurion, Yitzhak Ben-Zvi and others. Continued: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/959229.html

-----
AUSCHWITZ-THE SHRINKING NUMBERS
A myth does not need evidence - IN THE BEGINNING, it was proclaimed that 4 million of the
celebrated "Six Million" died at this famous wartime campsite. Then, in the face of growing skepticism, that figure was quietly reduced by 2.5 million to 1.5 million. Now, a final tally by the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross estimates reliably that the total number of deaths were less than 140,000—including those who died of old age over a five-year period in a place comparable in size to a city of a quarter million, where obituary pages would normally be replete with the names of thousands who had died during a similar time span!
Others at the internment center died of wartime conditions, aggravated by the outbreak of typhoid and Allied bombing, which caused disruption to the delivery of food, medicine, and other vital supplies.
There were, however, no gassings—or gas-chamber facilities, for that matter.
Less than half of those who died were Jews. Their names are carefully recorded in the 46-volume death books held in the Soviet archives and released to the Red Cross in 1989. Besides the person's full name, these volumes document his or her profession, religion, date and place of birth, pre-Auschwitz residence, parents' names, time of death, and cause of death, as determined by a camp physician. Mass murderers do not keep such meticulous records! - This message is brought to you in the interest of truth and historical accuracy by the — NEW ORDER - Dept E - PO Box 270486 - Milwaukee WI 53227 -

-----
NETANYAHU, ONCE HAWKISH, NOW TOUTS PRAGMATISM
New York Times - Feb 22, 2009 - JERUSALEM — Benjamin Netanyahu, the Likud Party leader chosen Friday to form Israel’s next government, likes to tell a story about his meeting last summer in Jerusalem with President Obama, who was then still the Democratic candidate. As it was ending Mr. Obama pulled Mr. Netanyahu aside from their aides to a corner of the room in the King David Hotel.
“You and I have a lot in common,” Mr. Obama said, according to Mr. Netanyahu’s account. “I started on the left and moved to the center. You started on the right and moved to the center. We are both pragmatists who like to get things done.”
Whether that turns out to be an accurate assessment will determine much of what happens in the American-Israeli relationship in the next couple of years and in efforts to make progress on Middle East peace.
But what is almost as noteworthy is that Mr. Netanyahu tells the story with pride and a kind of endorsement. Although he is a hawkish man of the right and runs the largest conservative party in Israel, he considers himself a pragmatist.
He has long said that he hoped to form a centrist governing coalition and he restated that ambition on Friday, calling on the centrist Kadima Party, led by Tzipi Livni, and the center-left Labor Party, led by Ehud Barak, to join him in a unity government. Mr. Netanyahu and Ms. Livni have agreed to meet Sunday, but the negotiations are likely to be tough. Ms. Livni, his chief rival for the premiership, has said she would rather go into opposition than serve as a fig leaf for a coalition of the right.
Mr. Barak, whose Labor Party fared badly in the elections, has already said he would head into the opposition.
To many here, it is increasingly likely that Mr. Netanyahu’s government will consist exclusively of parties from the right, which oppose a Palestinian state and favor expanding Israeli settlements in the West Bank, making it much harder for him to exercise his pragmatic penchant.
Mr. Netanyahu, 59, who earned a bachelor’s degree at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and speaks flawless English, is no newcomer to Israeli politics or to claims of pragmatism. Raised in Jerusalem and in a suburb of Philadelphia, where his father was a history professor, he served in an elite Israeli military unit under Mr. Barak, the current defense minister. The author of several books, he has a daughter from a first wife and two sons with his current wife, Sara.
He was ambassador to the United Nations while still in his 30s and has held numerous ministerial posts. He was prime minister between 1996 and 1999, and although he opposed the 1993 Oslo peace accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, he then met with the Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat and forged an agreement with him to share the volatile West Bank city of Hebron.
That led ultimately to new elections (the Israeli right abandoned him) and victory for Mr. Barak.
Mr. Netanyahu remains a deep skeptic about the Muslim world’s intentions toward Israel and tends to highlight fears more than hopes for the region. He opposed Israel’s withdrawal in 2005 from Gaza, saying it would lead to Hamas rockets on Israel, which it did. Like other dark predictions of his, that has led Israelis to see him as a reliable guide to the region.
Today, he says stopping Iran from going nuclear is a much more important issue than whether a Palestinian state is established. He has made clear that the Iranian challenge is an existential one that could well lead to military action.
He believes that if Iran’s ambition for regional hegemony is checked and its nuclear program stopped, then its clients, Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, will be of less concern.
Mr. Netanyahu does not plan to end negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, although he wants to refocus them on building the Palestinian economy and its institutions in the West Bank rather than on signing a comprehensive deal. The Palestinian leadership has openly disdained that approach.
Still, many of the steps that the departing prime minister, Ehud Olmert, and the Palestinians have agreed to regarding economic development have stalled, and Mr. Netanyahu believes his ability to cut through bureaucratic red tape could make a difference. He has told the former British prime minister, Tony Blair, who is the international representative to the Palestinians, that he could more quickly build industrial zones, cut back on checkpoints and generally improve life in the West Bank.
Whether he would be willing to remove Israeli settlements, however, or give up enough territory to satisfy the Palestinians remain open questions, as does whether he could return the Golan Heights to Syria in exchange for a peace accord. He has said no a number of times, and again last week, arguing for Golan’s strategic value.
But when he was prime minister a decade ago he explored the issue through an American intermediary. The Israeli election campaign in recent weeks tilted rightward after the war in Gaza, so he may have been campaigning rather than revealing his true intentions. Those on the left who dislike Mr. Netanyahu say they hope he is as personally ambitious as they suspect and that pressure from Washington will produce results.
“I don’t think he has much compunction in sacrificing an ideological position as long as it keeps him in power,” said Yaron Ezrahi, a liberal political scientist at Hebrew University. “We either need a prime minister who is ideologically committed to a two-state solution and has the power to move the country in that direction, or a very flexible opportunist who appears committed to the right but acts according to what is necessary.”
But Mr. Netanyahu’s associates and fellow Likud activists say that he remains committed to core principles and that his flexibility reflects a change in his party’s position.
“Likud as a party has made a major transformation in the last 15 years from being rigidly committed to retaining all the land of Israel to looking pragmatically at how to retain for Israel defensible borders in a very uncertain Middle East,” said Dore Gold, a former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations and a close associate.
For Mr. Netanyahu, that has meant accepting that much of the West Bank will be part of a future Palestinian state, but with Israel keeping control of the borders, airspace and electromagnetic frequencies. The state would also have no military, by his reckoning.
Whether such a deal would ever be acceptable to the Palestinians is far from clear. Equally unclear is whether the government he forms will allow him the freedom of action to go even that far. End item
Isabel Kershner contributed
http://peace-in-jerusalem.cephasministry.com/monitoring_the_ongoing_peace_process_3.html

-----
HORST MAHLER RECEIVES SIX-YEAR SENTENCE
Posted by JohninBasel - Zionism Is Destroying Civilization
MUNICH - 25 February 2009 - German dissident Horst Mahler has been sentenced to six years in prison for "Volksverhetzung" (racial incitement). The symbolically significant number of years imposed for "anti- Semitic hate speech" stemmed from his refusal to recognize the Jewish Holocaust®, which he described as "the biggest lie in world history."
FACING LIFELONG IMPRISONMENT
Dissident Horst Mahler is seen here with his wife Sylvia Stolz, currently in prison for defending other dissidents. The 73-year-old defendant was accused, among other things, of repeated dissemination of his views on the Internet as well as distribution of a revisionist videotape and a CD and book by Holo-skeptic Germar Rudolf, now serving time for "Holocaust® denial" in a German prison. Immediately following sentencing, the 73-year-old dissident was arrested and led away before astonished onlookers in the courtroom, including many of his supporters. The former attorney for the rightwing National Democratic Party (NPD) successfully represented that organization when the German regime tried to have it banned in the 1990s. He earlier received prison sentences for thought-crimes on several occasions.
'I have resolved to call a lie a lie'
In his concluding remarks before the court, Mahler noted that with another case pending against him he faces a total of over 12 years in prison - the equivalent of a life sentence, given his advanced age. He would, however, stand by his views. In setting a personal example, Mahler declared that it was incumbent upon every German to "deal a deathblow to the Holocaust® religion as martyrs for the truth."
The dissident defendant concluded by saying: "I have resolved to expose this Talmudic perfidy, that over and over again I will call a lie a lie and oppose it with the truth. I have sworn to my people never to give up in this fight against the Holocaust® religion." Continued: http://northwestnationalists.blogspot.com/2009/02/horst-mahler-arrested-in-courtroom.html

-----
ASK THE POSSIBLE OF THE IMPOSSIBLE "WHERE IS YOUR DWELLING PLACE?"
Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD - A Bedouin in cyberspace, a villager at home - From a Palestinian Perspective..
Arrests last night throughout the West Bank including in our area of Bethlehem.
The reports on radio suggest that this was intended to apply pressure on Hamas because Israel wanted a deal to free the captured Israeli occupation soldier with minimal cost in terms of releasing native Palestinian political prisoners.
Later in the morning and after stopping by at the University (again seeing the settlements on all around), I gave a talk to a visiting group from the US. The group is from California and they came under the auspices of the “Geneva Initiative”. I was rather bluntly honest with them that this initiative cannot make a basis for a durable peace because as Amnesty International said about the Oslo process: it failed before it started because it ignored human rights. To read more about the Geneva Initiative, please see http://www.arabmediawatch.com/amw/CountryBackgrounds/Palestine/
PeaceProposals/GenevaAccord/tabid/131/Default.aspx
http://www.boykotisrael.dk/geneva_understandings_promote_a_.htm
The meeting lasts much longer than expected because of significant discussion. Having given hundreds of talks and engaged in lots of fruitful dialogs with Israeli and International Zionists almost daily, I believe that even when some individuals get emotional, that such a discussion is better than no discussion. Later in the day I mention to my wife that I am struck that some who support political Zionism from outside have stronger views than Israeli Jews who support political Zionism. For example, very few Israeli Jews claim that the Palestinian refugees are not refugees or claim that it is possible to reject their international rights simply because "there is no space for them to return without displacing Jews" (this simply is not true as social and demographic studies show most of the places they left are not being utilized). No, the only real objection Israeli Zionists give me is the more honest (and more understandable) reason for challenging the implementation of the right of return: that this would change the nature of the Jewish state. This latter, and more straight-forward opinion, can be dealt with; we can discuss for example what is the nature of the Jewish state, we can discuss the fact that there are already 5.5 million Palestinians within the state (1.5 million if one counts areas only within the Green Line). Anyway, it is possible to discuss these things and arrive at a way forward that respects human rights while allaying the fears of all people here (whether rational or irrational fears; and Palestinians have far more to fear in this situation than Israelis since 2/3rds of us are refugees and displaced people and we lost tens of thousands of civilians over the past 60 years). The late Professor Edward Said once said in the 1960s that Palestinians are not allowed to tell their narratives. I think more and more Palestinians are telling their narratives (conflicting as they may be on political and other ideologies). I also think more and more Israelis are telling different narratives than the one dogmatic view of this conflict being tribal (the view of Zionism that there are "two sides" to this story, Israeli and Palestinian). I explained that certainly the conflict in South Africa was not about "Whites vs Blacks" but those who supported apartheid and those who did not (and there were blacks and whites who supported apartheid as well as whites and blacks who rejected it). It is the same here. But still, everytime I give a talk, I think I could have done better relaying reality on the ground here.
I then went back to Bethlehem University and workd with some students on projects then returned home. My small yard is now set with fast growing beans, sunflower, and peas in addition to all the trees. The trees are growing new leaves (on the lemons, figs, olives, and almonds). The green almond fruits are delicious and go well with salt and fresh lemons :-). Earlier this week we planted the seeds of Faqoos (small endemic kind of cucumber family) and Koosa (Like Zuchhini Squash). I got on the computer briefly to check e-mails. I engaged in discussion with Israelis and others on peace on mepeace.org. On e-mails, I noted that the Pope is confirmed to visiting here in May and I received an email asking me to sign to request that he visits Gaza. “As in all times, the way of reconciliation exemplified by Jesus calls us to initiate social healing by visiting, eating with, listening to, and risking our safety in solidarity with the “least among us” -- in this case the people of Gaza.” This makes sense since Jesus asked his followers to consider that the poorest and most destitute are God’s body!
Our friend Dr. Haidar Eid from Gaza (the One Democratic State Group) posted an excellent article titled “Who Said Nearly 50 Years Ago that Israel was an Apartheid State?” by Ronnie Kasril, a Jewish South African and was minister of Intelligence in the post Apartheid era.
http://www.odsg.org/co/index.php/Articles/27-one-state/1222-who-said-nearly-50-years-ago-that-israel-was-an-apartheid-state.html
Also see Address by Ronnie Kasrils at "Israel Apartheid Week":
http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/60684/
The day ended on a sour note: Palestinian factions (with very limited participation of 13 indepenedents) ended their scheduled meetings in Cairo without really solving the most problematical issue - the nature of the Palestinain interim authority that will set the stage for new elections for us (the prisoners in the ghettos/cantons of the West Bank and Gaza. I myself blame everyone including myself for not pressing them enough to end the bickering and get on with real unity based on a program of struggle for freedom. I wonder in my mind how many of them read this appeal for unity http://www.cipmo.org/1501-indice-rassegna/appeal-for-national-unity.html
and how many really understand what it means that in 2-4 weeks we will have a Russian racist, who calls openly for ethnic cleansing, as Israel’s foreign minister? (other Israeli leaders engage in ethnic cleansing but have more clever and diplomatically covered ways of doing it). I thought of the saying taht Fate/God does not change what is to happen to a peopel unless they change what is within themselves. Israelis and Palestinains (each one of us) needs to look more in the mirror (as Jesus said not look at the speck in our brothers eye but mind the log in our own eyes). I wonder if we humans will rise to the challenge in the next few weeks or sink further into posturing and slogans.
Wednesday 18 March 2009
Last night we saw a film produced by an Israeli on the nonviolent resistance in Bilin. I had seen this film before but I was again impressed by the extent of ingenuity of the villagers (supported by Internationals and some Israelis). The apartheid (the term used for it is Hafrada or Segregation in Hebrew) wall is built on their village lands and behind the wall lies over half of their best agricultural lands that were taken to expand an illegal colonial Jewish settlement. Variations of forms of resistance to the apartheid wall and land confiscation includes:
- Tying themelves with chains to olive trees being uprooted
- Marching silently with English, Arabic, and Hebrew signs
- Marching loudly and telling soldiers to refuse service
- Cutting the fences built there
- Building a mock fence with Palestinians chained under it on their land so that soldiers were forced to “dismantle” the mock fence
- Putting a caravan on their land and staying in it (many settlements buildings were built without even a permit from the Israeli occupation forces so this tests selective law enforcement).
- When the caravan is destroyed, putting an actual permanent structure overnight
- And on and on
All these tactics are met with violent responses ranging from using sonic booms, to high pressure water hoses, to stun grenades, to tear gas (spiked with other chemicals), to salt pellet guns, to rubber coated steel bullets, and to live ammunition. Everything was tried. These weekly demonstrations happen in many other villages with land loss. Many villagers were injured, some killed, many imprisoned and bankrupted with large fines etc. Yet, the world’s sleazy politicians hypocritically ignore thousands of Palestinians killed and focus on any Israelis injured or killed. But the people are by and large waking up to the nature of this racist system of Apartheid.
I woke up today and had a great and refreshing cup of Arabic coffee and think to myself: life is still good. I checked emails; hundreds with news and views and actions and from students and from scientific colleagues and on and on. But I lingered on one email from a British volunteer who was attacked in a peaceful demonstration in Palestine and was beaten, detained, jailed and then deported by the Israeli colonial state. Excerpt:
so im back in my home town, … it was a bit unexpected being whisked away from all that i was absorbed in, stuck in jail for 4 days and then stuck on a plane back to the uk, but im getting back into the swing of things…..the palestinians know how to live and love. the folk here have been bombarded with wealth for so long that they fail to see any other plausible way of living and so take their luxury life style with a pinch of salt…give me palestine any day….sadly i've got a ten year ban on coming back so i cant even get into the west bank. i am gutted, but i will return one day.….everyday i get anxious feelings about the work i personally left uncompleted and the people i left disappointed….all the people i never got the chance to say a proper goodbye to. i never thought it would come to deportation. after my second court appearance it seemed that all would be fine if i could get a new visa, just an application for a new visa by the time of my next bail date at kiriyat arba police station in hebron. however, first the israel ministry of the interior in jerusalem told me that as i was living in bethlehem i must get a visa from the palestinian authority. so i got an application in process in bethlehem only to be told by the israeli police that this wasn’t good enough and that the matter would be transferred to israeli immigration. so they arrested and took 4 days to deport me during which time i was moved around various jails ending up in ramle amongst african refugees. this really was an eye opener. refugees held in prison, some for 3 years without any notification as to how long they might spend there. none of them had money for lawyers and none of them had a country to return to. israel was threatening most of them with deportation even though they were pleading political assylum. i was told by a few that if they returned they would likely be killed.. the lawyer that saw me told me that if i didnt hire her services i was looking at spending 3 months in jail. i knew she was lying just to make me panic and get my money. i had already been told that the british consulate would get me out in at most a week. so, you can imagine how much money she must have swindled out of these captive refugees, those with any money that is. i would love to hear from you all. take care for now, much love…”
I drove to Bethlehem University where I met a Dean in the Parking lot who was angry that the Israelis at the checkpoint delayed him for one hour demanding he dismantle the spare tire on his car (he has a Jerusalem ID and thus a yellow license plate so could drive his car unlike me with a West Bank white/green license plate). He asked them to do it themselves and search whatever they want but it is not his job to take things apart for them! Acts of civil resistance like this are done by the millions everyday in Palestine.
In a Palestinian newspaper I read that the Israeli supreme court (after delays of five years) refused a petition that requests it to issue a ruling that Muslim Holy Sites should be treated by the Israeli government just like Jewish Holy Sites (in terms of maintenance, protection etc). The court claimed in this racist ruling that it was due to difficulty for the Jewish state to determine Muslim Holy Sites (obviously there is no “difficulty” about deciding Jewish holy sites). Hundreds of mosques have already been demolished in the past 60 years and others turned into things like nightclubs and art galleries. The remaining Muslim ancient sites are pillaged, buried, ignored, etc. while Israel spends millions to maintain and build (and in some cases even fabricate) Jewish Holy Sites.
In the web version of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, I read that Israeli leaders blamed Hamas for failure of prisoner swap and have then taken more political prisoners to pressure Hamas. A reader response caught my eyes: “This is insane what Zionists keep indulging in, an exercise of unabashed narcissism. It`s nothing more than a self-righteous sanctimonious orgy of self-gratification and self-glorification. What are they drinking in Zion to be so out there in the stratosphere? Israel murdered over 1,300 people just a month or so ago, injured over 5,000 - majority civilians and kids, and bombed 100% civilian infrastructure (since no military infrastructure exists) and Zionists got the chutzpah to talk about 'blood on their hands'? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? To top all of that, Israel has locked up and rounded up thousands (over 11,000 to be exact) of Palestinians who today rot in prisons somewhere in the desert and their only crime was to be born NOT JEWISH. Only in Israel, POW exchanges are performed by bleeding heart puritans. Give me a break, just because a slaughterhouse is kosher doesn`t mean it`s any less bloody than non-kosher slaughterhouses. Israel has more war criminals/terrorists than Las Vegas has gamblers. It`s time for the holier than thou act to end”. Part of me wants to think the worst is yet to come here with an extreme right government in Israel. The other part of me sees the growing chorus of Jews and non-Jews engaged in telling the reality and challenging the stereotypes and racism.
In the same newspaper website edition, we learn that “During Operation Cast Lead (Gaza Invasion earlier this year), Israeli forces killed Palestinian civilians under permissive rules of engagement and intentionally destroyed their property, say soldiers who fought in the offensive….The speakers included combat pilots and infantry soldiers. Their testimony runs counter to the Israel Defense Forces' claims that Israeli troops observed a high level of moral behavior during the operation.”
In the afternoon, we met with new people (Two US citizens who are Fullbright fellows in Jordan and another US citizen visiting on her own) and toured the apartheid wall and the settlements that now ring Bethlehem area on all sides. I show new groups or inividuals things here almost every day. Each time, I am always amazed at how connected we are. How especially Jewish and non-Jewish young people (19-28 year olds) catch on very quickly to what is going on here even when they get no history background. But we also have fun (eating Knaffa, wonderful Palestinian sweets) and have good walks in abandoned military posts that get our circulation going while watching a beautiful sunset over Bethlehem. In the evening we watched “Walz With Bashir”, an Israeli documentary using animation to relay experiences of Israeli soldiers in Lebanon. These experiences include machine gun attacks on civilian cars killing an entire family, and lighting the sky and observing as Israeli trained and equipped Lebanese Phallange Militias massacre hundreds of Palestinians in Sabra and Shatila refugee camps (September, 1982).
http://qumsiyeh.org
Asks the Possible of the Impossible, "Where is your dwelling-place?" "In the dreams of the Impotent," comes the answer. Rabindranth Tagore - Join us in Palestine for the Palestine Summer Celebration - http://www.sirajcenter.org/

-----
 

 NEWSLETTERS

 NEWS INDEX

MAIN INDEX