INTERNATIONAL PULSE

Period: December 2007

6666666

 

ISRAEL



-----
PA: ISRAEL AGREES TO DESTROY JEWISH TOWNS, STARTING IN NOVEMBER
by Hillel Fendel - IsraelNN.com - September 13, 2007 - The Palestinian Authority's Maan news agency has published a copy, in Hebrew, of PM Olmert's agreement to expel tens of thousands of Jews and replace them with a Palestinian state. The report states that Israel has agreed to begin destroying Jewish towns in Judea and Samaria immediately following the US-sponsored international summit this coming November. The PA claims that the document's eight points represent the principles of agreement between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas, in anticipation of the upcoming Middle East summit. The document begins by stating that Israel and the PA are to immediately enter a process "that will lead to the formation of two states, Israel and Palestine, side by side," and are "to reach understandings of the type detailed below." The eight points upon which Olmert and Abbas undertake to agree are the following:
1. Israel will end the occupation of the West Bank within an agreed-upon time period. The retreat and the evacuation of the settlements will occur gradually and in several stages. Each area that is evacuated will be transferred to the Palestinian Authority, which will instill law and order there. The existence of a regime in Gaza that is willing to be part of the peace process will enable Israel to view Gaza and the West Bank as one political entity. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/123663

-----
PM OLMERT URGES PUTIN TO BACK NEW IRAN SANCTIONS
PM
.......Olmert and Russian President Putin shaking hands before their meeting in Moscow on ......Thursday. (Moshe Milner / GPO)
Haaretz.com - October 18, 2007 - By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent, and Reuters. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert met Tuesday with Russian President Vladimir Putin, pressing Moscow to support new sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear activities and urging Russia not to sell arms to Iran or Syria. Hosting Olmert for a brief, abruptly announced visit, Putin promised to brief the Israeli leader on his talks with Iranian leaders earlier this week and acknowledged his guest's dismay over Tehran's nuclear program, which Israel and the United States say is aimed at developing atomic weapons.
A senior official in the prime minister's entourage said that Olmert was pleased with the results of the meeting. "Russian President Vladimir Putin exhibited great understanding of the Israeli position regarding all matters on the agenda, especially with the Iranian issue," the official said after the talks. "There was an open and serious atmosphere [in the meeting] and the prime minister is very pleased with the results of his visit," he added. The meeting came amid mixed signals over the issue from Putin and Russian resistance to a new, third round of United Nations sanctions against Iran over its refusal to halt uranium enrichment. In the Kremlin talks, Olmert expressed his opinion that effective sanctions imposed by the international community would have the potential to stop Iran pursuing the nuclear path, the prime minister's spokeswoman, Miri Eisin, said.
"Iran's nuclear program was the foremost issue, but Olmert also conveyed Israel's concern over the Iranian and Syrian desire to acquire from Russia the types of weapons that could change the balance in the area," Eisin said after the meeting, which lasted more than three hours. "The prime minister reiterated his stance that only effective sanctions by the world can stop Iran's nuclear aspirations," Eisin said. She added that Olmert warned that Iran's and Syria's quest to acquire advanced weapons systems from Russia "could change the balance of power in the region." As they sat down, Putin told Olmert he would share with him the results of talks he held with Iranian leaders during his visit to Tehran earlier this week - the first by a Kremlin leader since 1943. Continued: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/914397.html

-----
RABBIS 'STUNNED' OVER CONCESSIONS IN JERUSALEM
IsraelNN.com - by Hillel Fendel - October 18, 2007 - Rabbis unite in call to strengthen Israel's hold on Jerusalem - but one says the Israeli-Arab city Um el-Fahm and environs can be traded. "We have been stunned and shocked to hear of the intentions of our enemies from within and without, who speak openly about giving away and abandoning the Temple Mount and parts of the Jewish People's eternal capital." So begins a declaration issued today by the Yesha (Judea and Samaria) Rabbis Council, headed by Rabbis Dov Lior and Zalman Melamed. "The very thought of foreign defilement and control of the Mountain of G-d's Abode and in holy Jerusalem is shocking to every Jew. The Nation of Israel, charged with preserving the sanctity of the Temple Mount, the Western Wall and all of Jerusalem - east and west - throughout the generations, will not allow these destructive, catastrophic and irresponsible intentions to be implemented, Heaven forbid." "Those who even mention the possibility of abandoning the Temple Mount and of dividing Jerusalem will be forever remembered in ignominy by the Nation of Israel."
Rabbi Rosenne's Call
Rabbi Yisrael Rosenne, head of the Zomet Institute for Jewish Law, Technology and Modern Society, registers his own call to preserve Jerusalem - but throws in an unexpected add-on. In his weekly column in Zomet's "Shabbat B'Shabbato" synagogue pamphlet, Rabbi Rosenne writes: "...Once again Jerusalem is under the knife on the operating table! ... Once again a trial balloon is sent off towards the Israeli public to see how it will respond to major concessions... But Master of the Universe, from how many national and security assets must we divest ourselves? We have conceded and conceded, and made gesture after gesture, and have 'come towards' again and again; we have given up the flowering Gush Etzion, and the Philadelphi Route, and we have freed thousands of dangerous terrorists - but did all this move anyone on the other side? Have we heard even the slightest peep of true peace over there? ..."
Continued: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/123964

-----
U.N.: INTERPRETER ERRED ON IAF SYRIA RAID
By ASSOCIATED PRESS - UNITED NATIONS - INTERNATIONAL JPOST - Oct. 18, 2007 - The United Nations on Wednesday blamed an interpreter's error for an erroneous report that Syria claimed an Israeli air strike hit a Syrian nuclear facility, a mistake that made headlines in the Middle East and heightened concerns over Damascus' nuclear ambitions. Syria denied on Wednesday that one of its representatives told the UN General Assembly's committee that deals with disarmament on Tuesday that Israel had attacked a Syrian nuclear facility and added that "such facilities do not exist in Syria."
The state-run Syrian Arab News Agency, SANA, quoting an unnamed Foreign Ministry source, said its representative was misquoted - and after more than seven hours of investigation the United Nations said that was indeed the case.
"There was an interpretation error made yesterday when the First Committee was in session," UN associate spokesman Farhan Haq said. "There was no use of the word nuclear."
"Although in English the interpreter had suggested that the Syrian delegate had referred to an attack on a nuclear facility, what he said was `like what happened on the 6th of September against my country,"' Haq said. The incident started Tuesday night with a UN press summary of the First Committee that paraphrased an unnamed Syrian representative as saying that "Israel was the fourth largest exporter of weapons of mass destruction and a violator of other nations' airspace, and it had taken action against nuclear facilities, including the 6 July attack in Syria."
Israeli warplanes carried out an air strike in northeastern Syria near the border with Turkey on September 6, not July 6. The target remains unknown but widespread reports say it may have been a nascent nuclear facility, a claim Syria has denied. At UN headquarters in New York, the spokesman's office said Wednesday morning the Syrian representative spoke in Arabic. After several hours, Haq said the exact words of the English interpreter were: "An entity that is the fourth largest exporter of weapons of mass destruction in the world, an entity that violates other countries' airspace, and that takes action against nuclear facilities, including the attack on 6 July this year on a nuclear facility in my country - that entity has no right to lie, which it has done consistently."
It took until late afternoon for the UN to issue the correct translation from the original Arabic words spoken by the Syrian representative. According to the corrected text, the Syrian delegate said: "...the (entity) that is ranking number four among the exporters of lethal weapons in the world; that which violates the airspace of sovereign states and carries out military aggression against them, like what happened on September 6 against my country, such entity with all those characteristics and even more, has no right for its representative to go on lying without shame..."
Continue: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380585730&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

-----
IRAN: BUSH WARNING ENDANGERS INTERNATIONAL PEACE
By ASSOCIATED PRESS - JPost.com - October 18, 2007 - TEHERAN, Iran - Iran on Thursday denounced a warning by US President George W. Bush that the Islamic Republic's nuclear activities could lead to World War III, saying the statement was warlike rhetoric geared at diverting US attention from White House failures in Iraq.
... Bush gestures during a press conference in the briefing room ...of the White House. Photo: AP
RELATED: Nuclear Iran could cause 'World War III'
"The expression by the US president will eventually cause international insecurity. This sort of policy will jeopardize peace and security at the international level, and is a barrier for peace," the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Mohammad Ali Hosseini, said in a statement. Hosseini said the US president was resorting to "warlike rhetoric" to divert the American public's attention from White House failures on international issues such as Iraq and Afghanistan. On Wednesday, President Bush warned that a nuclear Iran could ignite a world war. "I've told people that if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them (Iran) from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," Bush said.
Continued: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380592368&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

-----
RESPONSE TO VULTURES IN ISRAEL TRACT
There have been questions about remarks in a tract referencing statements I made about the vulture population in Israel. I have not seen a copy of this tract and do not know how my references to the vultures have been interpreted.
The statements I made are on page 91-99 in my updated book, 25 Messianic Signs in Israel Today. Over the past 40 years, I have been to Israel 50 times. When I first went to Israel there were no vultures, as far as I know or can remember. Since then, vultures have returned to the Gamla area, and they have been nesting in the deep canyons on the east side of the Sea of Galilee.
As reported to me by the park rangers at Gamla, these vultures have been laying two to four times as many eggs as vultures usually do. Four or five years ago there was a problem, as many of the vultures were dying due to some type of poisoning, but this was diagnosed and taken care of by the park employees.
When I was at Gamla in November of 2006, dozens of buzzards were in the sky over the area. As indicated in my book, Israel has adopted the vulture as its national bird, and the airforce has a no-fly policy over the area during the nesting season.
I have no information about the increase or decrease in the vulture population outside the Israel/Golan Heights area, nor have I claimed to have such information. In my book as an addendum to my remarks about buzzards, my Israeli guide, Gila Treibich, has verified that everything I have said about the vultures is accurate. NOAH W. HUTCHINGS http://www.swrc.com/about/about.html#vultures

-----
'IRAN REVOLUTION ENDS THE 'HOLOCULT'
December 17 2006
From: Mathaba
"The Iran conference on the Holocaust cuts the Achilles heel of the current Anglo-Zionist world order"
By Dr. Sahib Mustaqim Bleher - The Iranians may not even be aware of it, but their hosting of the recent Holocaust conference may prove to be the most important milestone in their history since the Islamic Revolution under Khomeini. Western politicians and media certainly grasped the significance of the event, with Germany's premier Merkel standing shoulder to shoulder with prime minister Olmert of the only-democracy-in-the-middle- east-that-is-not-a-democracy" - the apartheid state of Israel - and with BBC television news presenting the bizarre spectacle of discussing, rather than reporting on, an alleged anti-Semitic conference whilst the images in the background showed traditionally clad Orthodox Jews happily in attendance.
When the Islam-hating Western media attacked the prophet Muhammad under the pretence of freedom of speech, Iran retaliated by testing the limits of those freedoms with its own holocaust cartoon competition. In doing so they stumbled across the most jealously guarded dogma of secular Western society, the Holocult. Whereas questioning and reviling religious beliefs is almost a cornerstone underpinning the mindset of those societies, even genuine historical research into the subject of a subsection of the 60 million who died in the second world war is prohibited and most certainly leads to being ostracised in public: The suffering of the Jews may not be questioned since "if it were to be proven that ‘The Holocaust’ has, in fact, been stage-managed for political reasons in order to promote Israeli interests, then the State of Israel and the United States as public players, and the global Zionist organizations as private lobbying entities would have to accept their share of responsibility for the damage, suffering and hardship they have wrought upon the Middle East and the world and, accordingly, they should be held accountable." Continued:
http://globalfire.tv/nj/07en/history/end_of_holocult.htm

-----
IRAQ WILL HAVE TO WAIT
Vice President Dick Cheney struts in front of an F/A-18 fighter jet aboard the USS John C. Stennis aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf. The Stennis is part of a carrier group sent to the region in order to intimidate, and perhaps bombard, Iran.
AP photo / Gerald Herbert
By Scott Ritter - September27, 2007
The long-awaited “progress report” of Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on the status of the occupation of Iraq has been made, providing Americans, via the compliant media, with the spectacle of loyal Bush yes men offering faith-based analysis in lieu of fact-based assessment. In the days and weeks that have since passed, two things have become clear: Neither Congress nor the American people (including the antiwar movement) have a plan or the gumption to confront President Bush in anything more than cosmetic fashion over the war in Iraq, and while those charged with oversight mill about looking to score cheap political points and/or save face, the administration continues its march toward conflict with Iran unimpeded.
Bush responded to the Petraeus report by indicating that he would be inclined to start reducing the level of U.S. forces in Iraq sometime soon (maybe December, maybe the spring of 2008). But the bottom line is that the troop levels in Iraq keep expanding, as does the infrastructure of perpetual occupation. The Democrats in Congress are focused on winning the White House in 2008, not stopping a failed war, and as such they not only refuse to decisively confront the president on Iraq, they are trying to out-posture him over who would be the tougher opponent of an expansionist Iran.
Here’s the danger: While the antiwar movement focuses its limited resources on trying to leverage real congressional opposition to the war in Iraq, which simply will not happen before the 2008 election, the Bush administration and its Democratic opponents will outflank the antiwar movement on the issue of Iran, pushing forward an aggressive agenda in the face of light or nonexistent opposition.
Of the two problems (the reality of Iraq, the potential of Iran), Iran is by far the more important. The war in Iraq isn’t going to expand tenfold overnight. By simply doing nothing, the Democrats can rest assured that Bush’s bad policy will simply keep failing. War with Iran, on the other hand, can still be prevented. We are talking about the potential for conflict at this time, not the reality of war. But time is not on the side of peace. Continued: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20070927_ritter_stop_iran_war/

-----
RUSSIA WANTS TO MOVE FLEET TO SYRIA! GET READY EZEKIEL 38!
Open Seal Prophecy News - 27 August 2007 - For some time reports have circulated that Russia is planning to move its Black Sea Fleet to Syria. Admiral Vladimir Masorin, Commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, confirmed that Russia plans to establish a permanent naval base on the Mediterranean. Which will be of great "strategic importance." WOW! Here they come- look out Israel- your day of Ezekiel's vision is on the horizon. For the first time since the end of the Cold War, Russia will establish naval bases in the Syrian port cities of Tartus and Latakia. Moscow is also planning to form a squadron led by the 'Moskva,' the Black Sea Fleet's flagship missile cruiser. Russia has already began dredging at the Syrian port of Tartus for their ships. Both the U.S. and Israel are quite wary of this new development. Israeli officials believe that Russian naval vessels will be used to spy on Israel. I think they are getting ready for the strike against Israel as the bear (Russia) is brought down to the mountains of Israel to their own destruction. For years Russia has sought such a warm water port. I see the hook is already in the bear's jaw! hlliscar@aol.com

-----
KNESSET MAJORITY. "DON'T DIVIDE JERUSALEM!’
IsraelNN.com - by Hana Levi Julian - October 19, 2007 - More than half of Knesset Members from both the opposition and the coalition factions have signed a petition against plans to hand over parts of Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority.
The document rejects plans to relinquish Israel’s sovereignty over holy sites in the Old City and the City of David, just outside the Old City walls, as well as possible intentions to give eastern Jerusalem’s Arab neighborhoods to the PA.
Likud MK Yisrael Katz and other Likud MKs spearheaded the drive, and they were quickly joined by nearly 30 coalition MKs, including thirteen members of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s own Kadima party and all of Shas. Two Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel Our Home) MKs, David Rotem and Esterina Tartman, signed the petition, as did Yoram Marciano of Labor - the only Labor MK to do so. Four ministers also signed the petition, including Yaakov Edry and Ze’ev Boim of the Kadima party, and two others from the Gil Pensioners’ party. “It is possible that Olmert could divide Jerusalem and we would have to face that reality, but it’s illegitimate, especially since he’s putting Jerusalem on the agenda to distract from his other problems,” said Likud MK Reuven Rivlin.
Olmert: Knesset Not Necessary
The prime minister asserted earlier this month that he does not need the Knesset’s approval to reach a joint declaration with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, including one that might include an agreement to hand over parts of Jerusalem to the PA. He has said that Jerusalem is not currently on the negotiating table, but several plans to divide the capital have emerged from Olmert’s close associates.
Prime Minister Olmert denied reports earlier in the week that his government planned to give away parts of the sacred capital, but avoided specifically defining the city limits, giving rise to speculation that he indeed intends to give up Israel’s control over some of Jerusalem.
Summit Still Not Certain
Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said she would meet again today (Friday) with PA negotiators in an attempt to come to a pre-summit agreement. Abbas said this week that the PA's participation in the US-sponsored summit was not a certainty, and that the PA would not retreat from its demands for a joint detailed pre-summit declaration with Israel. Israel insists on only a general declaration, with details to be ironed out later. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/123973

-----
IRAN TO HOLD PALESTINIAN SUMMIT SEEKS TO UNIFY PALESTINIAN MOVEMENT
September 5, 2007 - Iranian President Ahmadinejad will host various leaders from the Palestinian movement, including the top leadership within Hamas, Fatah and Jihad Islami. Participants in the meeting will include Damascus-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, Islamic Jihad leader Ramadan Shalah, Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) leader Nayef Hawatmeh, and the leader of the Syrian- backed Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, Ahmed Jibril. In addition, senior Fatah leader-in-exile Farouk Kadoumi, an adversary of Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, will join the meeting, the report said. According to Iran's Mehr news agency, Kadoumi met with Ahmadinejad on Tuesday. The Iranian leader praised the Palestinian organization for staying true to the path of "armed struggle," the report said.
"The Palestinian problem is still a gaping wound for the entire Islamic world and nations of the region," Ahmadinejad said. "The only way to treat it is through the resistance of the Palestinian nation, along with faith, unity and an unwavering stance." The Iranian President added that nobody was capable of defeating the Arabs of Palestine, and promised that the world's superpowers were headed for destruction.
Iran's call for a summit is an effort to restore unity to the Palestinian movement before any military conflict breaks out between Israel and her neighbors or a US attack on Iran. Depite President Ahmadinejad's claims that Iran is not worried about, nor believes an US attack is likely, behind the scenes the Iranian leadership is highly worried and working overtime to prepare for any military clash with the United States.
Meanwhile, Syria has suddenly become very quiet amid reports that Syria was preparing for an attack against Israel. It may well be that no Syrian attack will develop unless or until a unified Palestinian front can be developed on Israel's southern flank to create a 3-front war against Israel which would include Gaza in the south, the West Bank on the East and Syri-Lebanon in the north. For more on the summit to be held Thursday in Tehran, Full story: here.http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1188392541165&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

-----
IRAN'S PRESIDENT ON THE CHARLIE ROSE SHOW HERE
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/166.html
-----
THE JEWISH GENOCIDE OF AMERICAN CHRISTIANS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5849319366900015572&hl=en

-----
THERE MUST BE A DOZEN WAYS TO DESTROY YOUR COUNTRY:
How the Jewish Supremacists Wrecked America
zionistwatch - By Patrick Grimm - February 28, 2007
1. They have destroyed our pride in our history, and a nation that loses its sense of history soon ceases to be a nation.
2. They have labeled our beloved Founding Fathers as “racists” and “white slavers”, ignoring the great representative republic that these men constructed.
3. They have promoted multiculturalism, celebrating every culture – no matter how backward and barbaric – except for Western white European culture. As Jewish Marxist intellectual [..] Susan Sontag stated in a [...] “The white race is the cancer of humanity.”
4. They have driven our Christian faith and heritage from the public square by utilizing their countless criminal cadres of ADL and ACLU Communist lawyers. Our children will soon grow up in a society wiped clean of any vestiges of the Bible, Christ or the cross. However, the menorah is still allowed in the White House for Hannukah celebrations.
5. They have torn our borders open, permitting, indeed cheering, the Third World dregs who will soon replace us as the majority. The Javitzes, the Lautenbergs and Cellers meticulously designed the legislation that will genocide us. They have done all this while simultaneously – and with no sense of irony – supporting Israel’s “Jews-only” immigration policy. Full story:
http://zionistwatch.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/there-must-be-a-dozen-ways-to-destroy-your-country-how-the-jewish-
supremacists-wrecked-america/

-----
OUTCRY OF DESPERATION
The Christian world and top U.S. Christian leaders are being urged to petition the Israeli government to immediately halt a massive dig Islamic authorities are conducting on the Temple Mount – Judaism's holiest site – that is said to be destroying antiquities and what archaeologists believe is a wall from the Second Jewish Temple. The Israeli government has barred archaeologists from inspecting the Temple-era wall, believed to be from the outer courtyard of the Second Temple . The wall reportedly has been pulverized by bulldozers operated by the Waqf, the Mount's Muslim custodians. "The Christian people must rise up and stand with their brethren in Israel and make their voices heard to stop this travesty," states an open letter from Israel 's Temple Institute, an organization seeking to promote awareness of the Temple Mount. "We are asking Christians to do everything possible to petition the Israeli government to halt the Waqf destruction and have archaeologists immediately inspect the area." (The Israeli government does not respect Jewish heritage and the rights of her own people! It only responds to public opinion and pressure from outsiders!) http://www.shamrak.com/editorials.php

-----
OLMERT OFFERS JUDEA, SAMARIA, DIVIDES JERUSALEM IN DRAFTS ACCORD
IsraelNN.com - By Gil Ronen - Israel's government has agreed, in writing, to hand over 6,250 square kilometers of land – the equivalent of its entire biblical and strategic heartland - to an Arab terror state. So reports Dr. Guy Bechor, a leading expert on Arab affairs, who also supplies some of the details of the negotiations. Bechor reports, based on "leaks from the Palestinian side," that Israel has, in the past few days, presented Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas at least one draft of an "agreement of principles." The agreement calls for a state named Palestine to be established alongside Israel, and have a territory of 6,250 square kilometers: the equivalent of all of Judea, Samaria and Gaza.
"Palestine" will be demilitarized.
Most of the Jewish communities built in Judea and Samaria over the past 40 years are to demolished and their inhabitants expelled, according to the plan. The remaining communities are to be concentrated in small salients Most of the Jewish communities built in Judea and Samaria over the past 40 years are to be demolished and their inhabitants expelled. for which the Arab state will be compensated with additional territory elsewhere in present-day Israel. A passage of some sort will connect Gaza and Judea and Samaria. It will be under Jewish sovereignty and Palestinian administration. Israel agrees to redivide Jerusalem. Arab neighborhoods will be under Arab sovereignty and Jewish ones under Jewish sovereignty. Mention is made of "religious areas," but further details are not known as of yet. Each side will recognize the other's spiritual needs. The "refugee" question is not mentioned at all, and Bechor reports that this is the main sticking point. Abbas is insisting that Arabs descended from those who fled Israel in 1948 be allowed to return to Israel, at least in principle. Full story: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/123549

-----
BETRAYAL IN PROGRESS
Betrayal in Progress. Israel's government has agreed, in writing, to hand over 6,250 square kilometers of land – Israel's entire biblical and strategic heartland - to an Arab terror state. Most of the Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria are to be demolished and their inhabitants expelled, according to the plan. http://www.shamrak.com/editorials.php

-----
JIMMY CARTER'S WAR AGAINST ISRAEL
FrontPageMagazine.com 09/18/07 : http://www.terrorismawareness.org/jimmy-carters-war/

-----
FIRST ORTHODOX ATTORNEY GENERAL NOMINEE HAILED
Mukasey A Blank Slate On Pivotal Issues - James D. Besser - Washington Correspondent - 09/21/2007 First Orthodox attorney general nominee hailed, but record unclear on church-state, abortion, civil rights.
In a move with deep historic resonance for the Jewish community, President George W. Bush has turned to a respected Jewish jurist to restore credibility to a controversy-damaged Justice Department. The nomination is winning praise from a range of Jewish leaders, though his positions on a range of issues of concern to Jewish groups, including church-state law and abortion, remain a mystery.
This week’s selection as attorney general of retired Judge Michael Mukasey, 66, who has deep roots in New York’s Modern Orthodox community, echoes the 1974 appointment of Edward Levi to take over a department scarred and demoralized by the Watergate scandals. Levi is the only Jewish attorney general in American history until now. “In both cases you have a distinguished jurist who is bringing a lifelong devotion to the law to a Justice Department mired in crisis,” said Jonathan Sarna, a Brandeis historian. “It is often the case that outsiders are brought in at times like these. It’s not surprising that these presidents chose Jews with great legal competence.”
In another historical parallel, Mukasey, like Levi, will quickly have to deal with explosive issues involving the limits to federal investigative authority. But the broadly favorable response by Jewish leaders to his nomination, and signs of support from key Senate Democrats, concealed many question marks about Mukasey’s views. As a federal judge in Manhattan for 19 years, he left a scant record on church-state law and abortion rights, adding to the surprise of why he was picked by a president who until now has made ideology a litmus test for cabinet membership.
“He’s not a social conservative, as far as I can tell, and that’s important to our community,” said Marc Stern, legal director for the American Jewish Congress and a longtime leader in church-state jurisprudence. “We have no idea what he thinks about civil rights, no idea about his positions on church-state issues. And we don’t know much about what he thinks about abortion.” And Mukasey is not personally close to Bush, another prime consideration for top administration posts. In fact, the two met for the first time only this month. “That the president was willing to nominate a man whose views on some of these social issues are not known shows how focused the administration is on one issue,” Stern said.File deleted Continued:
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=14552

-----
RARE OPPORTUNITY FOR PEACE
Majdi Halabi Published: 09.27.07 - Israel Opinion - For first time in 60 years, all Arab states willing to recognize Israel. Last month, Jordan's Foreign Minister Abdul Ilah Khatib and his Egyptian counterpart, Ahmed Abul Gheit, presented to our prime minister and political leaders the details of the Arab initiative ratified in Saudi Arabia. The initiative, which was rejected by former premier Ariel Sharon, who was busy with the disengagement at the time, is back on the international stage, and constitutes a rare window of opportunity. For the first time in 60 years, all Arab countries are willing to recognize the existence of the Jewish state and even maintain normal relations with it. The conditions for it, according to a source involved in drafting the initiative, are very general: Israel is obligated to withdraw from the occupied territories and grant the Palestinians an independent state whose capital is east Jerusalem. In addition, the initiative calls for a fair solution to the Palestinian refugee problem. However, the initiative does not require the parties to base an agreement on the precise 1967 borders or allow refugees to enter Israel. In addition, the initiative does not stipulate that the Old City in Jerusalem become the Palestinian capital.
http://www.cephas-library.com/israel_opportunity_for_peace.html

-----
ECONOMIST TALLIES SWELLING COST OF ISRAEL TO US
By David R. Francis - Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor - Since 1973, Israel has cost the United States about $1.6 trillion. If divided by today's population, that is more than $5,700 per person. This is an estimate by Thomas Stauffer, a consulting economist in Washington. For decades, his analyses of the Middle East scene have made him a frequent thorn in the side of the Israel lobby.
del.icio.us - The US & Israel - 04/20/98 - US Aid to Israel: Will It Shrink?
Is U.S backing of Israel worth it? For the first time in many years, Mr. Stauffer has tallied the total cost to the US of its backing of Israel in its drawn-out, violent dispute with the Palestinians. So far, he figures, the bill adds up to more than twice the cost of the Vietnam War. And now Israel wants more. In a meeting at the White House late last month, Israeli officials made a pitch for $4 billion in additional military aid to defray the rising costs of dealing with the intifada and suicide bombings. They also asked for more than $8 billion in loan guarantees to help the country's recession-bound economy. Considering Israel's deep economic troubles, Stauffer doubts the Israel bonds covered by the loan guarantees will ever be repaid. The bonds are likely to be structured so they don't pay interest until they reach maturity. If Stauffer is right, the US would end up paying both principal and interest, perhaps 10 years out.
Israel's request could be part of a supplemental spending bill that's likely to be passed early next year, perhaps wrapped in with the cost of a war with Iraq. Israel is the largest recipient of US foreign aid. It is already due to get $2.04 billion in military assistance and $720 million in economic aid in fiscal 2003. It has been getting $3 billion a year for years. Adjusting the official aid to 2001 dollars in purchasing power, Israel has been given $240 billion since 1973, Stauffer reckons. In addition, the US has given Egypt $117 billion and Jordan $22 billion in foreign aid in return for signing peace treaties with Israel. "Consequently, politically, if not administratively, those outlays are part of the total package of support for Israel," argues Stauffer in a lecture on the total costs of US Middle East policy, commissioned by the US Army War College, for a recent conference at the University of Maine. These foreign-aid costs are well known. Many Americans would probably say it is money well spent to support a beleagured democracy of some strategic interest. But Stauffer wonders if Americans are aware of the full bill for supporting Israel since some costs, if not hidden, are little known. Continued: http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html


-----
CONFIRMATION: WITH A VENGEANCE - THE KENNEBUNKPORT WARNING AND THE ROGUE B-52 - Flash page: wait for links scroll down: By Webster G. Tarpley - October 8, 2007 - http://www.jimmarrs.com/

-----
KADDISH IN FRANCE
Commentary was given by Scott Simon in NPR radio, August 11, 2007 - "There used to be a joke in Paris, what is the difference between the chief rabbi in France and the Cardinal of Paris? The Cardinal speaks Yiddish! Jean Marie Cardinal Lustiger was buried yesterday; he died this week of cancer. He was born almost 81 years ago to Polish parents who ran a dress shop in Paris. When the German army marched in his parents sent him and his sister into hiding with a Catholic family in Orleans. Their mother was captured and sent to Auschwitz. In 1999 as Cardinal of Paris, Jean Marie Lustiger took part in reading of the names of France's day of remembrance of Jews who had been deported and murdered. He came to the name Gesele Lustiger, paused, teared and said, my mama. The effect in France during a time of revived anti-Semitism was electric.
He was just 13 and in hiding when he converted to Catholicism, not to escape the Nazis he always said, because no Jew could escape by conversion, and not of trauma, he said. Among his most controversial observations, I was born Jewish and so I remain, even if that is unacceptable for many. For me the vocation of Israel is bringing light to the goyem. That is my hope and I believe that Christianity is the means for achieving it. There were a great number of rabbi's who consider his conversion a betrayal. Especially after so many European Jews had so narrowly escaped extinction. Cardinal Lustiger replied, to say that I am no longer a Jew is like denying my father and mother, my grandfathers and grandmothers. I am as Jewish as all other members of my family that were butchered in Auschwitz and other camps.
He confessed to a biographer that he had a spiritual crisis in the 1970's provoked by persistent anti-Semitism in France. He studied Hebrew, and considered emigrating. He said I thought that I had finished what I had to do here, he explained and I might find new meaning in Israel. But just at that time the pope appointed him bishop of Orleans. He found purpose he said in the plight of immigrant workers. Then he was elevated to Cardinal.
The Archbishop of Paris. Jean Marie Lustiger was close to the Pope. They shared a doctrinal conservatism. He also battled bigotry and totalitarianism. For years Cardinal Lustiger's name was among those who was considered to succeed John Paul. Without putting himself forth, the Cardinal joked that few things would bedevil bigots more than a Jewish Pope. They don't like to admit it he said, but what Christians believe, they got - through Jews. The funeral for Cardinal Lustiger began at Notre Dame Cathedral yesterday (August 10/07), with the chanting of Kaddish, the Jewish prayer for the dead." Sometimes there are profound inconsistencies in our world. Word From Yerushalaim
http://www.wordfromyerushalaim.com

-----

 NEWSLETTERS

 NEWS INDEX

 MAIN INDEX