INTERNATIONAL PULSE

Period: April 2007

6666666

 

ISRAEL



WORD FROM YERUSHALAIM
Simantov Allalouf - The link below will take you to a short 10 minute video which clearly illustrates the indoctrination of the Palestinian people from birth. To hate and to kill. Is this the people we in Israel should give up our promised land of inheritance to? Watch this and then send it to your congressman and government officials. They need to know that fuelling hatred will ultimately cause it to even come to your home town one day. Click here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im8L0Klhgds
http://www.wordfromyerushalaim.com

-----
ISRAELI NUCLEAR STRIKE ON IRAN TURNED BACK
By William Thomas - January 18th 2007 - recent strike by nuclear-armed Israeli Air Force fighter-bombers bound for targets in Iran was turned back after being intercepted by U.S. fighters over Iraq, this reporter has learned. Two sources have independently confirmed the encounter, which took place on January 7, 2007. Though the first informant offered few details beyond an initial tip, a second source long-known by this reporter to have well-placed U.S. and “non-U.S.” military and government contacts provided specific information regarding the raid, which was aimed at the radical religious ayatollahs holding ultimate power in Iran.
Israeli nuclear strikes are not unprecedented. Soon after Desert Storm, U.S. Navy pilots told this reporter in Kuwait how in late 1990 Israel made good on its pledge to respond in kind to WMD attacks by launching nuclear-armed aircraft against Baghdad following a lethal assault on Tel Aviv by Scud missiles tipped with chemical warheads. That air strike was called off when the Americans refused to provide the vital IFF codes needed to fly through U.S.-controlled airspace.
When questioned concerning the “Identification Friend or Foe” transponder codes needed to overfly Iraq today, this source said that allied Israeli aircraft are routinely provided “squawk codes” when flying missions aimed at acquiring the characteristics of air defence radars triggered by their approach to Syrian, Jordanian, Iranian and U.S.-controlled Iraqi airspace. Continued:
http://www.cephas-library.com/israeli_nuclear_strike_on_iran_turned_back.html

-----
 
 

JEWS AGAINST ZIONISM
The Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem is a Direct Consequence of the Zionist Ideology!
November 9, 2006, the Central Rabbinical Congress (CRC) of the United States and Canada will protest the Gay Pride Parade scheduled in Jerusalem for this Friday, November 10. The protest will take place in front of the Israeli Consulate at 800 Second Avenue, in New York City, at 4:00 p.m.
On Friday, in Jerusalem, protestors against the parade are expected to number over 250,000 and additional local protests have been organized in most of Israel's major cities.
Israeli Police have been compelled to mobilize an incredible force of 12,000 officers from all over the country to try to prevent bloodshed and Magen Dovid Adom, the Israeli medical corps, has been forced to mobilize 50 ambulances and 10 para-medic motorcycles.
Spokesman Rabbi Joseph Dershowitz stated: "The Zionist made it their goal to replace the eternal Jewish religion with empty nationalism. They discarded the age-old Jewish hope for the redemption of the messiah and replaced it with a political military achievement. They discarded the Jewish reverence for the Holy Land and longing for Jerusalem and the Temple, and replaced it with a secular, democratic country in which sin and immorality are defended as legal rights. It is only natural that this total disrespect for all that is sacred to the Jewish people should culminate in their trampling openly and proudly on the laws of immoral relationships called by the Torah "abominations", acts that even the most assimilated Jews in past generations would never have dreamed of committing."
Coincidentally the "Gay Pride" parade is scheduled to occur during the week of the Torah lesson on the destruction of the ancient city of Sodom. Rabbi Dershowitz continued, "And now, in the week in which we read in the Torah about G-d's destruction of Sodom (Genesis 19), the unthinkable is happening: the modern-day Sodomites are bringing their perversion into the streets of Jerusalem, with the smiling approval of the Israeli Supreme Court, threatening to make the Holy City into the next Sodom."
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/news/newsletters/jaz110906.htm

-----
IS KABALISTIC RABBI KADINI'S YESHUA THE REAL THING, OR THE ANTICHRIST?
By Stephen Yulish Ph.D.- In September of 2005, a friend sent me an article from Arutz Sheva which is Israel National News, entitled "Kabbalist (Rabbi Kaduri) urges Jews to Israel ahead of impending disasters." I had been very tempted to just delete the article because of my disdain for anything to do with Jewish mystical lore (i.e. Kabbalah). From personal experience, I had found out that it was not of God.
Let me explain. There has been a resurgence of late in the ancient Jewish mystical practice of Kabbalah as a result of many Hollywood types, some Jewish and some not, falling into this spiritual delusion. Don’t be fooled, dabbling in this type of endeavor can have serious consequences on you and your children’s lives. I am not going to quote scripture to you or give you an intellectual argument for avoiding Kabbalah. I am going instead to tell you a real story about one person’s descent into the spiritual arrogance of Kabbalah and hope that it scares the hell out of you. That person was me! Continued:
http://therefinersfire.org/kabbalah_messiah.htm

-----
A COVENANT WITH AND AGREEMENT WITH HELL
THE PLAN CALLS FOR A FULL ISRAELI WITHDRAWAL FROM AREAS CAPTURED 1967
".... The plan calls for a full Israeli withdrawal from areas captured in the 1967 Middle East war, paving the way for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. In exchange, Israel would receive full diplomatic recognition from the Arab world.
Olmert told his Cabinet Sunday that he is "ready to treat seriously" the proposal.
"We hope very much that at the meeting of heads of Arab states to take place in Riyadh, the positive elements expressed in the Saudi initiative will be revalidated and will perhaps improve the chances of negotiation between us and the Palestinian Authority."
In the past, Israel has rejected the plan's call for a full withdrawal from the West Bank and east Jerusalem. It also objects to language that apparently endorses a large-scale return of Palestinian refugees to areas inside Israel. Israel says the return of large numbers of refugees would mean the end of the country as a Jewish state.
"This is something that contradicts the concept of two states," Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni told Israel Radio. "Our position has long been, two national states, one a Jewish state, a national home for the Jewish people and the future Palestinian state, that is the solution for the Palestinian people, including the refugees."
Livni said, however, the proposal could be the basis for negotiations. The Saudi initiative also is endorsed in the "road map," an internationally backed peace plan accepted by Israel and the Palestinians...
Israel and Saudi Arabia are both staunch U.S. allies in the Middle East. Both countries are interested in bolstering Arab moderates to counter the rising influence of Iran and radical anti-Israel groups, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
Israel media have been reporting an apparently chance meeting between Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh and Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir, in Washington over the weekend.
The Yediot Ahronot newspaper said Monday that the encounter occurred in the corridors of the State Department and quoted al-Jubeir as telling Sneh, "I hope that in the coming weeks we shall move onto a positive track."
 
THEY AGREE TO DIVIDE GOD'S PROMISED LAND.
See Joel 3:2 and Daniel 11:39 - U.S. President George W. Bush shaking hands with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in the Oval Office at the White House. May 23, 2006 (Reuters) Immediately prior to the first day of the tribulation and the covenant confirmation ceremony, something exciting is going to happen to the true believers in Christ Jesus: "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18). Pastor James McCutchan jmccutchan@aol.com

-----
INTRODUCTION: CHRISTIAN ZIONISM DEFINED
The term Zionism refers to a political Jewish movement for the establishment of a national homeland in Palestine for the Jews that have been dispersed. On the other hand, a Christian Zionist is a person who is more interested in helping God fulfil His prophetic plan through the physical and political Israel, rather than helping Him fulfil His evangelistic plan through the Body of Christ. - At its simplest, Christian Zionism has been defined as 'Christian support for Zionism.'1 In Der Judenstaat, published in 1896, Theodor Herzl forcefully articulated the aspirations of Jewish Zionists for their own homeland, although the Zionist dream was largely nurtured and shaped by Christian Zionists long before it was able to inspire widespread Jewish support in the 1940's.2
At the First Zionist Congress which Herzl convened a year later in Basle, the Zionist aspiration was formulated in a call for a, 'publicly secured and legally assured homeland for the Jews in Palestine.'3 At the 27th Zionist Congress held in Jerusalem in 1968, Zionism was defined in terms of five principles:
1) the unity of the Jewish people and the centrality of Israel in Jewish life; 2) the in-gathering of the Jewish people in its historic homeland, Eretz Israel; 3) the strengthening of the State of Israel; 4) the preservation of the identity of the Jewish people; and 5) the protection of Jewish rights.4
Sharif understands political Zionism to be '...the ideological instrument for mobilizing international support for an exclusively Jewish state in Palestine.' She observes how in 1975, the United Nations General Assembly passed resolution 3379 (XXX) defining Zionism as, 'a form of racism and racial discrimination.'5 It was no longer politically correct to view Zionism as merely another national liberation movement, in this case for Jews. Uri Davis has written probably the most critical book on the realisation of the Zionist goal, entitled, Israel, an Apartheid State.6 Contemporary Christian Zionism is in part a reaction to this world-wide criticism.
So, for example, in 1967, following the passing of U.N. Resolution 242 in protest at Israel's occupation of the West Bank, and Palestinian Jerusalem, when the entire international community closed their embassy's in Jerusalem, the International Christian Embassy moved to Jerusalem expressly to show solidarity with Israel. They and other Christian Zionists believe that the modern State of Israel, and Zionism in general, are divinely mandated, the fulfilment of God's promise to Abraham. 'I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.' (Genesis 12:3)7 So, Hal Lindsey could assert, 'The center of the entire prophetic forecast is the State of Israel."8
Christian Zionists see themselves as defenders of, and apologists for, the Jewish people, and in particular, the State of Israel. This support involves opposing those deemed to be critical of, or hostile toward Israel.9 It is rare therefore to find Christian Zionists who feel a similar solidarity with the Palestinians
http://www.theunjustmedia.com/Christian%20Zionists/Introduction%20christian%20zionism%20defined.htm

-----
THE ZIONIST PLAN FOR THE MIDDLE EAST
Translated by Israel Shahak The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947
"... From the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates" said Theodore Herzl. In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates."
Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: "The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon."
from
Oded Yinon's

"A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties"
Published by the
Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.
Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982
Special Document No. 1
(ISBN 0-937694-56-8)
The Association of Arab-American University Graduates finds it compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with Oded Yinon's article which appeared in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Oded Yinon is an Israeli journalist and was formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel. To our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed and unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East. Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the "vision" for the entire Middle East of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Begin, Sharon and Eitan. Its importance, hence, lies not in its historical value but in the nightmare which it presents.
The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.
This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication, Israel's Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach's study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.
The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Oded Yinon in his essay, "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980's," talks about "far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967" that are created by the "very stormy situation [that] surrounds Israel."
The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very much an active policy, but is pursued more forcefully in times of contlict, such as in the 1947-1948 war and in the 1967 war. An appendix entitled "Israel Talks of a New Exodus" is included in this publication to demonstrate past Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides the main Zionist document we present, other Zionist planning for the de-Palestinization of Palestine.
It is clear from the Kivunim document, published in February, 1982, that the "far-reaching opportunities" of which Zionist strategists have been thinking are the same "opportunities" of which they are trying to convince the world and which they claim were generated by their June, 1982 invasion. It is also clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target since their viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or later.
Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy, unfortunately, suffers from ambiguity and incoherence. There is no indication that Arab strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead, they react with incredulity and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle East is not taken seriously Arab reaction to any future siege of other Arab capitals will be the same.
Khalil Nakhleh July 23, 1982 Continued: http://www.theunjustmedia.com/the%20zionist_plan_for_the_middle_east.htm

-----
HAMAS-FATAH DEAL SIGNED
 
Norway First to Resume Support Hamas and Fatah officially signed a power-sharing agreement Saturday. Norway was the first to announc its support for the Hamas-led PA government.
Norway was home to the original back-channel talks between left-wing Israeli politicians and the PLO when it was still illegal to meet with the terror group and later hosted the Ill-fated Oslo Accords, which created and called for the arming of the Palestinian Authority.
Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere said Saturday hat the new PA government is "taking steps toward complying with international demands…Norway will thus on this basis re-establish political and economic relations with the Palestinian government,” he said. "We've resumed normal political relations.”
The move is expected to renew some of the foreign aid cut since Hamas won a landslide victory over Fatah in parliamentary elections over a year ago.
Army Radio quoted diplomatic sources saying Spain and Ireland may be next to embrace the new PA government. France has invited PA officials on an official visit and Britain plans on interacting with the government through its non-Hamas members.
Among members of the so-called Quartet - the United Nations, US, European Union and Russia - the latter two have responded most positively to the new PA government.
"It is inarguably an important event in terms of consolidation of the Palestinian ranks," a statement from Russia’s Foreign Ministry said. The European Union said it “welcomes the formation of a Palestinian Government of National Unity pursuant to the agreement reached in Mecca on 8 February 2007, which lays the foundation for Palestinian reconciliation.” The EU stopped short of pledging renewed support pending an assessment of the government’s compliance with the Quartet’s principles. "The Presidency of the EU recalls the readiness of the EU to work with and to resume its assistance to a legitimate Palestinian government adopting a platform reflecting the Quartet principles,” a statement read. “The EU will carefully assess the platform and actions of the new government and its ministers.”
The US said that it stands by the unmet demands of the Quartet that the PA renounce terrorism and recognize Israel. Israel announced that it will boycott the new cabinet, though continue to conduct meetings with Fatah chief Mahmoud Abbas. Cabinet minister Raleb Majadele called upon the government to launch talks with the new PA government. Majadele argues that half of the members of the cabinet already signed agreements with Israeli under the Oslo Accords and other agreements. The radical northern branch of the Israeli-Arab Islamic Movement congratulated both Hamas and Fatah on the new power-sharing agreement and expressed its hope that the arrangement would serve the interests of Muslims living in Israel as well as in PA-controlled areas. The group appealed to the new government to make Jerusalem and the Temple Mount its top priorities. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/121873

-----
NEW ISRAELI ARAB MINISTER RALEB MAJADLE WON'T SING
New Israeli Arab Minister Raleb Majadle Won’t Sing Israel's National Anthem
Israel's first Muslim Arab Minister of Science, Culture, and Sports, Raleb Majadle refuses to sing Israel’s national anthem, HaTikvah. Majadle, a long-time member of the Labor party defended his decision, saying he does not believe that “enlightened and sane Jews” would request a Muslim to sing a song which speaks to the Jewish people. “The Arabs are not in a mood to sing right now,” the Arab minister in Israel's government commented.
The new minister said in an interview with the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, “To the best of my knowledge, the law does not require me to sing the anthem, but to honor it.” He said he expresses his respect by standing up when the anthem is sung. “Of course I would not sing the anthem in its current form. But before we talk about symbols, I want to talk about equal education for my children. It’s more important that my son would be able to buy a house, live with dignity.” Majadle’s announcement led to protests from National Religious camp and staunch support from Israeli Arab Knesset Members.
MK Aryeh Eldad (NU/NRP) explained that he does not desire to force Majadle to sing the anthem, but believes that someone who does not identify with the character of the state as expressed by the national anthem should not be serving as a minister.
MK Zevulun Orlev (NU/NRP) expressed concern that Majadle’s refusal might be a violation of his declaration of loyalty to the state, and requested that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ask Majadle if he is loyal to Israel as a Jewish state. Arab MK Ahmed Tibi (United Arab List) responded, “The attacks on him from the Right are hypocritical, self-righteous and ridiculous.” MK Tibi added that he too never sings the anthem. “HaTikvah’s words cannot be sung by any Arab citizen,” he pointed out. “Lately we have witnessed a torrent of anti-Arab statements and this should be understood in this context,” he said.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/121874

-----
CRITICS: OLMERT UNPOPULAR BECAUSE HE IS A FAILURE
By Hana Levi Julian - (IsraelNN.com) Knesset Members pounced on Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's speech to Kadima leaders Thursday night, saying his statements demonstrated his failure as a leader.
The Prime Minister dismissed polls showing his popularity at a record low, saying he is leading the country rather than trying to be popular. He also slammed investigators and journalists, blaming them for his poor ratings. His statements denouncing attacks by the media and opposition aroused even more criticism by Knesset members who chided him for pushing the “victim” button in his speech.
Kadima with the notable exception of Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Tzipi Livni expressed support for the beleaguered Prime Minister, who is facing two investigations on bribery and corruption charges, in addition to a personal critique in the soon-to-be-published interim Winograd Report. The Winograd Commission was appointed by Olmert himself to probe the conduct of government officials during last summer’s war against Hizbullah terrorists in Lebanon.
Party officials were not as positive about Livni’s remarks after the speech, however.
Livni, a fellow Kadima member who is widely considered the top candidate to replace Prime Minister Olmert if the government fails, was the lone voice in the crowd who evaded expressing outright support for him. She confined her remarks to calling on party members to unite behind the Prime Minister.
Kadima officials close to Olmert criticized her for putting politics above the party’s welfare. “All of the party’s top members stood behind the prime minister and managed to rise above their own political concerns – except for Livni,” said an Olmert aide. “The political situation isn’t easy for anyone, but there were those who knew to do the right thing and support the Prime Minister, and those who didn’t.”
Members of other political parties were quick to add fuel to the fire.
Likud MK Yisrael Katz vowed to introduce a bill to dissolve the Knesset because the speech "proved that Olmert has lost control...and there is no choice other than to call new elections."
National Union MK Uri Ariel called for the Prime Minister to resign.
From the opposite side of the political spectrum, Meretz Knesset Member Avshalom Vilan said, "The Prime Minister sounded pathetic to a certain degree." He advised Olmert to “examine himself instead of saying that everyone else is wrong."
Likud Knesset Member Limor Livnat scored Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for making an "excellent" speech that "does not forgive the tragedies of the past several months and collapse of government policy...and security." Continued: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/121866


-----
NEW PA FOREIGN MINISTER: RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL IS IMPLICIT
March 18, 2007 By KHALED ABU TOAMEH -Two ministers in the Hamas-led unity coalition said on Saturday that although there is no explicit recognition of Israel in the political program of the government, such recognition is evident in the fact that it has pledged to respect agreements reached with Israel in the past.
"I think this is a very moderate political program," said Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Ziad Abu Amr, an independent academic from the Gaza Strip. "I think it addresses every single condition of the Quartet. There is no reason whatsoever for any country, after this political program is embraced by the new Palestinian government, to continue with the boycott."
Israel certain Quartet wall won't crumble New Palestinian unity government's platform
Top ministers in PA unity coalition Abu Amr told The Jerusalem Post the platform constituted an implicit recognition of Israel. "The recognition of Israel is included in the various articles of the program," he said. "The program talks about honoring signed agreements that include the mutual recognition between Israel and the PLO, as well as the Oslo Accords. I don't think there is any excuse now to continue the boycott."
Abu Amr expressed hope that the US administration and the Europeans would reconsider their policy toward the Palestinians. "We expect members of the international community and Washington to review their old position, to change it and to start dealing with the new government," he said. "I think the Palestinians have made so many steps forward and we expect reciprocity."
PA Information Minister Mustafa Barghouti, head of the Independent Palestine list, told the Post the government's political program was "very progressive." The program, he said, placed great emphasis on the rights of women and respecting international and humanitarian laws. "This is a government that must be accepted and dealt with by the entire international community, if there is justice in this world," he said.
"We are recognizing and accepting and honoring the existing agreements. The president [Abbas] is assigned - and will be supported - by the government to negotiate with Israel. This government says that our goal is the establishment of an independent, sovereign and democratic Palestinian state in the 1967 borders.
"If Israel wants recognition, it has to recognize the Palestinians as well. Today there is no excuse for anybody not to accept the government unless they want us to remain slaves of occupation and Israel, which will never happen.
Continued: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879107118&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

-----
ABBAS OFFERS ISRAEL 'PEACE OF FREEDOM''
By KHALED ABU TOAMEH - March 18, 2007 - The Palestinians have received assurances from some European Union countries that they will end their boycott of the PA government with the swearing-in of the new unity coalition, Ghazi Hamad, spokesman for the Hamas-led coalition, said on Saturday.
He said the countries that have already signaled their willingness to deal with the new government include Norway, France, Britain and Germany. Labor, Kadima split on new PA gov't Analysis: Strategically crafted ambiguity Hamad told The Jerusalem Post shortly before the Palestinian Legislative Council endorsed the new coalition that several Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Qatar, had been exerting heavy pressure on the US to accept the new government and to lift sanctions imposed in the aftermath of Hamas's victory in the 2006 parliamentary election. Legislators gave a standing ovation as the council approved the new government by an 83-3 majority on Saturday evening.
Eighty-seven out of the 132 members of the PLC participated in separate sessions in Ramallah and Gaza City, which were linked by videoconference. Forty-one legislators, among them 37 Hamas members, are in Israeli prisons.
The new program does not explicitly meet the three conditions set by the Quartet for dealing with the government - renouncing violence, recognizing Israel and abiding by previous agreements - but its wording is open to interpretation, with some arguing that it does meet these conditions.
Addressing the session in Gaza City, PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas said the unity government marked the beginning of "a new phase in the Palestinian struggle to establish an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital."
Referring to the first intifada, which began in 1987, Abbas said: "Today we are proud to say that all forms of struggle that we carried out led more than 10 years ago to the establishment of the Palestinian Authority and its institutions." He said the "national unity" agreement reached between Fatah and Hamas in Mecca last month was in the context of Palestinian efforts to "end the occupation of our lands that were occupied in 1967 and to ensure a just solution to the problem of the refugees on the basis of United Nations [General Assembly] Resolution 194."
Abbas's speech carried four messages, directed to Palestinians, Israelis, Arabs and the international community, respectively.
Addressing the Israelis, he said: "We are ready, without preconditions, to move forward with the peace process and resume negotiations between the Israeli government and the PLO. The policy of settlements, the construction of the racist separation fence and the siege of Jerusalem will only make the path to peace more difficult and complicated. We are once again extending our hand to achieve the peace of equality and freedom. Here I wish to emphasize that the Palestinians reject all forms of violence."
Abbas reiterated his pledge to do his utmost to secure the release of kidnapped IDF Cpl. Gilad Shalit as part of a prisoner swap. In his message to the Palestinians, Abbas expressed hope that the new government would focus on tackling the anarchy and lawlessness on the streets, implementing social and economic reforms, maintaining the security calm in the Gaza Strip and battling growing unemployment.
Continued: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879107125&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

-----
US 'DISTURBED' BY PA GOV'T PLATFORM
By ASSOCIATED PRESS - March. 18, 2007 - The Bush administration found little good to say Saturday about a Palestinian coalition government that falls short of Western demands and complicates US plans to revive long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said part of the platform announced Saturday was disturbing, and he called Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh's introductory speech disappointing.
Israel sure Quartet wall won't crumble
The PA prime minister called for pursuing "resistance" against Israel, adding that his government would support "all forms of resistance. In addition, the terms of the new government do not fully satisfy requirements imposed by international donors and would-be peacemakers that Palestinian leaders renounce violence, accept Israel's right to exist and abide by previous agreements the Palestinians made with Israel and others. "The ... reference to 'right of resistance' is disturbing and contradicts directly the Quartet principle of renunciation of violence," McCormack said, referring to the international peacemaking coalition of the United States, United Nations, European Union and Russia.
The rollout speech that Haniyeh delivered to the Palestinian Legislative Council "was disappointing and inconsistent with the quartet principles, as well as a missed opportunity" to affirm the new government's commitment to peace, McCormack said. Israeli officials went further, saying the platform "thumbs its nose" at the international demands. "This is a great disappointment and a severe blow to peace," said Sallai Meridor, Israel's ambassador in Washington. "Not only does this government call for continued terror attacks against Israel, it arms the extremists with veto power over any future agreements, with the intention of slamming the door on future prospects for peace." McCormack said the United States would continue to deal with PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and would continue to refuse dealings with Hamas officials. Contact with others would be evaluated case by case, McCormack said.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879107773&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

-----
THE SHAME OF BEING AN AMERICAN
By Paul Craig Roberts - July 22, 2006 - Gentle reader, do you know that Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing in southern Lebanon? Israel has ordered all the villagers to clear out. Israel then destroys their homes and murders the fleeing villagers. That way there is no one to come back and nothing to which to return, making it easier for Israel to grab the territory, just as Israel has been stealing Palestine from the Palestinians.
Do you know that one-third of the Lebanese civilians murdered by Israel's attacks on civilian residential districts are children? That is the report from Jan Egeland, the emergency relief coordinator for the UN. He says it is impossible for help to reach the wounded and those buried in rubble, because Israeli air strikes have blown up all the bridges and roads. Considering how often (almost always) Israel misses Hezbollah targets and hits civilian ones, one might think that Israeli fire is being guided by US satellites and US military GPS. Don't be surprised at US complicity. Why would the puppet be any less evil than the puppet master?
Of course, you don't know these things, because the US print and TV media do not report them.
Because Bush is so proud of himself, you do know that he has blocked every effort to stop the Israeli slaughter of Lebanese civilians. Bush has told the UN "NO." Bush has told the European Union "NO." Bush has told the pro-American Lebanese prime minister "NO." Twice. Bush is very proud of his firmness. He is enjoying Israel's rampage and wishes he could do the same thing in Iraq.
Does it make you a Proud American that "your" president gave Israel the green light to drop bombs on convoys of villagers fleeing from Israeli shelling, on residential neighborhoods in the capital of Beirut and throughout Lebanon, on hospitals, on power plants, on food production and storage, on ports, on civilian airports, on bridges, on roads, on every piece of infrastructure on which civilized life depends? Are you a Proud American? Or are you an Israeli puppet?
On July 20, "your" House of Representatives voted 410-8 in favor of Israel's massive war crimes in Lebanon. Not content with making every American complicit in war crimes, "your" House of Representatives, according to the Associated Press, also "condemns enemies of the Jewish state."
Who are the "enemies of the Jewish state"?
They are the Palestinians whose land has been stolen by the Jewish state, whose homes and olive groves have been destroyed by the Jewish state, whose children have been shot down in the streets by the Jewish state, whose women have been abused by the Jewish state. They are Palestinians who have been walled off into ghettos, who cannot reach their farm lands or medical care or schools, who cannot drive on roads through Palestine that have been constructed for Israelis only. They are Palestinians whose ancient towns have been invaded by militant Zionist "settlers" under the protection of the Israeli army who beat and persecute the Palestinians and drive them out of their towns. They are Palestinians who cannot allow their children outside their homes because they will be murdered by Israeli "settlers."
The Palestinians who confront Israeli evil are called "terrorists." When Bush forced free elections on Palestine, the people voted for Hamas. Hamas is the organization that has stood up to Israel. This means, of course, that Hamas is evil, anti-Semitic, un-American and terrorist. The US and Israel responded by cutting off all funds to the new government. Democracy is permitted only if it produces the results Bush and Israel want.
Israelis never practice terror. Only those who are in Israel's way are terrorists.
Another enemy of the Jewish state is Hezbollah. Hezbollah is a militia of Shi'ite Muslims created in 1982 when Israel first invaded Lebanon. During this invasion the great moral Jewish state arranged for the murder of refugees in refugee camps. The result of Israel's atrocities was Hezbollah, which fought the Israeli Army, defeated it, and drove it out of Lebanon. Today Hezbollah not only defends southern Lebanon but also provides social services such as orphanages and medical care.
To cut to the chase, the enemies of the Jewish state are any Muslim country not ruled by an American puppet friendly to Israel. Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the oil emirates have sided with Israel against their own kind, because they are dependent either on American money or on American protection from their own people. Sooner or later these totally corrupt governments that do not represent the people they rule will be overthrown. It is only a matter of time.
Indeed Bush and Israel may be hastening the process in their frantic effort to overthrow the governments of Syria and Iran. Both governments have more popular support than Bush has, but the White House Moron doesn't know this. The Moron thinks Syria and Iran will be "cakewalks" like Iraq, where ten proud divisions of the US military are tied down by a few lightly armed insurgents.
If you are still a Proud American, consider that your pride is doing nothing good for Israel or for America.
On July 20 when "your" House of Representatives, following "your" US Senate, passed the resolution in support of Israel's war crimes, the most powerful lobby in Washington, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), quickly got out a press release proclaiming "The American people overwhelming support Israel's war on terrorism and understand that we must stand by our closest ally in this time of crisis."
The truth is that Israel created the crisis by invading a country with a pro-American government. The truth is that the American people do not support Israel's war crimes, as the CNN quick poll results make clear and as was made clear by callers into C-Span.
Despite the Israeli spin on news provided by US "reporting," a majority of Americans do not approve of Israeli atrocities against Lebanese civilians. Hezbollah is located in southern Lebanon. If Israel is targeting Hezbollah, why are Israeli bombs falling on northern Lebanon? Why are they falling on Beirut? Why are they falling on civilian airports? On schools and hospitals?
Now we arrive at the main point. When the US Senate and House of Representatives pass resolutions in support of Israeli war crimes and condemn those who resist Israeli aggression, the Senate and House confirm Osama bin Laden's propaganda that America stands with Israel against the Arab and Muslim world.
Indeed, Israel, which has one of the world's largest per capita incomes, is the largest recipient of US foreign aid. Many believe that much of this "aid" comes back to AIPAC, which uses it to elect "our" representatives in Congress.
This perception is no favor to Israel, whose population is declining, as the smart ones have seen the writing on the wall and have been leaving. Israel is surrounded by hundreds of millions of Muslims who are being turned into enemies of Israel by Israel's actions and inhumane policies.
The hope in the Muslim world has always been that the United States would intervene in behalf of compromise and make Israel realize that Israel cannot steal Palestine and turn every Palestinian into a refugee Continued: http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=9381

-----
'NEW' PA: BUT WE DO RECOGNIZE ISRAEL
By Stan Goodenough - March 18, 2007 - The reconstituted, but still Hamas-led, Palestinian Authority went right to work at the weekend to spin further webs of deceit in an effort to hoodwink the international community into lifting their sanctions against the PA. But we do_ recognize Israel. The very fact that we have agreed to respect past agreements signed between Israel and the PLO proves that we do, two "ministers" argued, according to a Sunday morning report in _The Jerusalem Post.
The program of the "new" PA was "very moderate," cajoled so-called foreign minister Ziad Abu Amr, insisting that it "addresses every single condition of the Quartet."
"There is no reason whatsoever for any country, after this political program is embraced by the new Palestinian [sic] government, to continue with the boycott." While the PA's protestations are so transparent as to be laughable, there is concern in Israeli circles that the EU, Russia and the UN, the three of the four Quartet members most ready to go along with the Arab game, will be open to persuasion.
The Quartet's conditions include the PA's explicit recognition of the Jewish State of Israel, and its renunciation of violence and terrorism. In the Fatah-Hamas talks leading up to the establishment of the new PA, Hamas argued - and Fatah agreed - that it simply was not politically viable for Hamas to recognize Israel, and that the Islamist terror group (at least) must be permitted to pursue the use of, and support all forms of "resistance." These include "suicide" bombings and any other form of terrorism the Arab side chooses to use. http://www.jnewswire.com/article/1801

 

 NEWSLETTERS

 NEWS INDEX

 MAIN INDEX