Written
by Rev. Alan Cairns, Greenville, South Carolina
Distributed by Toronto Free Presbyterian Church
1600 Neilson Road, Scarborough, Ontario M1X 1S3
Dr.
Billy Graham constantly appeals to the Bible as the authority
for his teaching. "The Bible says" is one of his most
used expressions. It is good to make our appeal to Scripture,
for it alone can be our final authority (Isaiah 8:20). But it
must be more than empty words. There must be a full submission
to what the Bible says. In the case of Billy Graham the question
is:
Does
the Bible support the statements and actions of Dr. Graham?
We must weigh Dr. Graham's words against the Bible -- with startling
results.
DR. GRAHAM
DECLARES HIS GOSPEL TO BE THAT OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.
Speaking at the
Roman Catholic Belmont Abbey College, Noth Carolina, Dr. Graham
said: "The gospel that built this school and the
gospel that brings me here tonight is still the way to salvation"
(Gastonia Gazette, November 22, 1967). That is plain enough.
The then executive vice-president of Belmont Abbey College, Rev.
Cuthbert E. Allen, agreed. He wrote, "I have followed Billy
Graham's career and I must emphasize that he has been more Catholic
than otherwise... Billy Graham is preaching a moral and evangelical
theology most acceptable to Catholics." (Personal letter,
reproduced in Billy Graham and the Church of Rome, by
I.R.K. Paisley, Appendix. Document No.3).
The question
is: What is the gospel according to the church of Rome?
1. Rome's
gospel denies the full and final authority of Scripture.
The Second Vatican
Council flatly decreed: "The Church does not draw
her certainty about all revealed truth from the Holy Scriptures
alone. Hence both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted
and honored with equal feelings of devotion and reverence."
(Vatican II. Dei Veruum II.9).
The Bible says,
"To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according
to this word, it is because there is no light in them" (Isaiah
8:20). The reason for this is simple -- only in Scripture do
we have God's inspired, authoritative Word: "All scripture
is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine,
for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto
all good works" (II Timothy 3:16). To be adequately equipped,
we need nothing more than Scripture.
Paul's warning
is much to the point: "Beware lest any man spoil you...
after the tradition of men" (Colossians 2:8).
Does Billy
Graham preach Rome's gospel, as he claimed?
2. Rome's
gospel denies the once-for-all atoning sacrifice of Christ.
"The mystery
of the Eucharist is the true center of the sacred liturgy and
indeed of the whole Christian life" (Vaican II, Eucharisticum
Mysterium, Intro. A.). In this central act of worship Rome
claims that the Mass is "a sacrifice in which the sacrifice
of the cross is perpetuated." Again: "In the sacrifice
of the Mass our Lord is immolated" [i.e., killed as a sacrifice].
According to Rome, "in it [the Mass] Christ perpetuates
in an unbloody manner the sacrifice offered on the cross, offering
Himself to the Father for the world's salvation through the ministry
of the priests" (Vat. II, Euch. Myst. Intro. C).
Against all this
the Bible says, "This man, after he had offered one sacrifice
for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God"
(Hebrews 10:12). Jesus exclaimed on the cross, "It is
finished" (John 19:30), the meaning of which is fully
explained in Hebrews 9:24-26: "[Christ is entered] into
heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: nor
yet that he should offer himself often ... for then must
he often have suffered ... but now once in the end of the world
hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself."
Rome's gospel
is a blasphemous denial of Christ's atonement.
Does Billy
Graham still claim to preach this gospel of Rome?
3. Rome's
gospel denies justification by grace through faith in the merits
of the righteousness of Christ.
"If anyone
shall say that it is by the righteousness of Christ itself
that men are formally justified, -- let him be accursed"
(Council of Trent, Session VI, Canon 10). "If anyone shall
say that justifying faith is nothing else than trust in the Divine
mercy pardoning sins for Christ's sake; or that is is that trust
alone by which we are justified, -- let him be accursed"
(Canon 10). Here Rome places her curse on the very Word of God!.
The Bible says,
"By the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified
in his sight ... But now the righteousness of God ... which is
by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe"
(Romans 3:20-22).
Again it states;
"A man is justified by faith without the deeds of the
law" (Romans 3:28), and "God imputeth righteousness
without works" (Romans 4:6).
Rome's gospel
is a gospel of human works and merits. "Sins must be expiated.
This may be done on this earth through sorrows, miseries and
trials of this life and, above all, through death. Otherwise,
the expiation must be made in the next life through fire and
torments or purifying punishment" (Vat. II, Indulgentiarum
Doctrina, I.2).
In total contrast,
the Bible says, "Being now justified by his [Christ's] blood,
we shall be saved from wrath through him" (Romans 5:9).
Again: "Therefore
being [i.e., having been] justified by faith, we have peace with
God through our Lord Jesus Christ" (Romans 5:1). "There
is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ
Jesus" (Romans 8:1). The Apostle John gives the reason for
this freedom from condemnation: "Your sins are forgiven
you for his [Christ's] name's sake" (I John 2:12).
The gospel is
"Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose
sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not
impute sin" (Romans 4:7-8). This is the gospel that Rome
rejects.
Does Billy
Graham still claim to preach this gospel of Rome?
4. Rome's
gospel denies the sole mediation of Christ.
"The blessed
Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate,
Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix" (Vatican II, Lumen
Gentium, VIII Para. 62). Paragraph 61 of the same document
says Mary "shared her Son's sufferings as He died on the
cross. Thus, in a wholly singular way she co-operated... in the
work of the Savior in restoring supernatural life to souls."
Pope John Paul II has flatly stated that in Mary "is effected
the reconciliation of God with humanity ..., is accomplished
the work of reconciliation" (Pope John Paul II, On Reconciliation
and Penance, St. Paul Editions, p.139).
It is vain for
Rome to claim that all this does not violate the Scripture, which
says, "There is ... one mediator between God and men,
the man Christ Jesus" (I Timothy 2:5). The Bible says, "God
was in Christ [not Mary], reconciling the world unto himself"
(II Corinthians 5:19). Again, the Bible says, "God hath
given to us eternal life and this life is in his Son"
(I John 5:11). Contrast the slogan adopted by the second Vatican
Council, "Death through Eve, life through Mary"
(Lum. Gent., VIII Para. 56).
This is Rome's
gospel.
Does Billy
Graham still boast of preaching the same gospel?
If he does he
can have no message of salvation. Rome's gospel pronounces a
curse on any man who comes to believe that he is assured of salvation
and heaven in this life: "If any says that he will for certain
... have that great gift of perseverance unto the end, -- let
him be accursed" (Council of Trent, Session VI, Canon 16).
Has Billy Graham no better message than this?
Does he
still preach Rome's gospel?
The Apostle Paul
opposed such as preached a gospel like Rome's. He said, "Though
we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto
you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed"
(Galatians 1:8). Paul curses Rome's gospel, but Billy Graham
boasts that it is the same as the one he preaches.
DR. GRAHAM
HAILS THE POPE AS "THE GREATEST RELIGIOUS LEADER OF THE
MODERN WORLD."
He wrote this
in a lengthy article in the Saturday Evening Post, Jan./Feb.
1980, and went on to refer to John Paul II as "one of the
greatest moral and spiritual leaders of this century," "an
evangelist," who "sought to speak to the spiritual
hunger of our age in the same way Christians throughout the centuries
have spoken to the spiritual yearning of every age -- by pointing
people to Christ."
All this is most
deceitful. John Paul II proclaims every Roman Catholic heresy
noted above -- and then goes even further.
1. The Pope
bans sinners from going directly to Christ for pardon.
Confession to
a priest to obtain absolution from him "constitutes the
only ordinary way in which the faithful who are conscious of
serious sin are reconciled with God ... every serious sin must
always be stated, with its determining circumstances, in an individual
confession." (John Paul II, On Reconciliation and Penance,
p.132. The emphasis is his. The only extraordinary way he allows
is confession to a priest or priests in a group exercise pp.
128, 132.)
The Pope allows
no access to Christ for pardon, except through a human priest.
Is this "pointing men to Christ"? Nowhere in the New
Testament is any man placed between a penitent sinner and Christ.
Jesus said: "Come
unto me ... and I will give you rest" (Matthew 11:28).
The Bible says,
"Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the
holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way, which
he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say,
his flesh; and having an high priest [Christ] ... let us draw
near with a true heart in full assurance of faith" (Hebrews
10:19-22).
John Paul II
utterly contradicts this. Far from pointing men to Christ, he
places a barrier in their way to keep them from Christ.
2. The Pope
invites men "to turn with me to the Immaculate Heart of
Mary, Mother of Jesus, in whom 'is effected the reconciliation
of God with humanity.'"
He says that
to Mary's Immaculate Heart "we have repeatedly entrusted
the whole of humanity" (Reconciliation and Penance,
pp.139, 140).
The Bible knows
nothing of such language. Paul said, "I commend you to God,
and to the word of his grace" (Acts 20:32) -- not to Mary.
What kind of
spiritual leadership is the Pope giving? Is he pointing men to
Christ? How can Billy Graham appeal to what the Bible says and
at the same time hail a Mariolator as an evangelist who points
men to Christ?
STOP PRESS
Pope John Paul
II has just published his twelfth encyclical, Ut Unum Sint
(May They All Be One). In it he said the Roman Catholic Church
would not change its doctrines for the sake of unity, and asserted
his rule as the prime mover behind the ecumenical movement.
"With the
power and the authority without which such an office would be
illusory, the Bishop of Rome must ensure the communion of all
churches," he wrote in the 115-page document. "For
this reason, he is the first servant of unity."
The European,
2-8 June 1995
DR. GRAHAM
SENDS HIS ENQUIRERS INTO ROMAN CATHOLICISM, EASTERN ORTHODOXY,
LIBERAL PROTESTANTISM, ETC.
Long ago Dr.
Graham stated his policy for following up an enquirer: "His
name and address and a lot of information about him is taken
and within 24 hours that is sent to a minister of the church
of his choice regardless of denomination" (Interview in
U.S. News and World Report, August 27, 1954). This policy
has been consistently carried out. For example, in the Milwaukee
crusade of 1979, Sister Maureen Hopkins, a Roman Catholic nun,
was a member of the crusade committee. She received some 3,500
names and telephone numbers for her church to follow up. All
3,500 were invited to a special mass (remember what we showed
about the mass) "to remind enquirers that their commitments
to Christ should be nurtured within the sacramental framework
of the Church" (The Christian Courier, Milwaukee,
September 1979).
Does the Bible
have anything to say about such a policy? It certainly does.
In the early
church, converts "continued stedfastly in the apostles'
doctrine and fellowship" (Acts 2:42). They were not placed
under the care of deniers of the gospel. The Bible says, "Have
no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather
reprove them" (Ephesians 5:100). Dr. Graham's policy is
a blatant violation of the Bible which he professes to hold as
his supreme authority. No converts should be sent to any church
where they cannot emulate the converts of apostolic times and
fellowship on the basis of sound doctrine.
DR. GRAHAM
BETRAYS HIS BAPTIST BRETHREN IN RUSSIA
Of Russia Dr.
Graham said, "I think there is a lot more freedom here than
has been given the impression in the States because there are
hundreds, thousands of churches open." He went on to give
the impression that he found more religious freedom in Russia
than in England: "In Great Britain, they have a state church
... Here [in Russia] it is a free church, in the sense that it
is not headed officially, as the Church of England is headed
by the queen." (Los Angeles Times, May 14, 1982.
Emphasis added.)
A woman was arrested
at one of his Russian meetings for displaying a banner with the
message "We have more than 150 prisoners for the work of
the gospel." Dr. Graham defended the police for arresting
her. He said, "We detain people in the United States if
we catch them doing things that are wrong. I have had people
coming to my services in the United States causing disturbances
and they have been taken away by the police."
The Bible says,
"Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them; and
them which suffer adversity, as being yourselves also in the
body" (Hebrews 13:3). Dr. Graham in Russia did not want
to be reminded of the Baptist pastors and other Bible believers
being held in prisons and concentration camps for their faith.
They are brave sufferes for Christ. Billy Graham added to their
agony. He stabbed them in the back. He sided with the atheists
who arrested a courageous lady who dared to draw his attention
to their plight and condemned her as a disturber and a wrongdoer.
Dr. Graham should remember that the Bible says, "In the
day that thou stoodest on the other side, ... even thou wast
as one of them" (Obadiah 11). He identified his Russian
friends, and they were not his persecuted Baptist brethren. He
stood on the other side with their persecutors.
Dr. Graham appeals
to the Bible. Judge his message, his policy, and his fellowship
by the Bible. By that standard he stands exposed as blatantly
flaunting the plainest statements and standards of Scripture.
God's work cannot
be done in such a way. The Bible says: "Cursed be he
that doeth the work of the Lord deceitfully" (Jeremiah
48:10).
If the Bible
is right, Dr. Graham is wrong. The Bible is right.
Either Dr. Graham
should drop his appeal to the Bible or he should cease his wanton
disobedience of its message and methods.
We sincerely
pray that even at this late stage Dr. Graham will take the latter
course and "earnestly contend for the faith which was once
delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3). |